pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Fix for FETCH FIRST syntax problems
Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 17:16:45 -0400
Message-ID: <12746.1526851005@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKFQuwbBOmFiEp4npbQPDN9-Qc6Czoi04=H96YnUmLLBD-9VFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <877enz476l.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk>
	<22981.1526770675@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<03da97fc-9d6b-cbe1-c28f-cee7c1ba5c38@2ndquadrant.com>
	<25267.1526773270@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CAH2-Wz=XCtrYgKy2QhToivePvuSpx3Eteo7TYrzZPsom-w0VdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKFQuwbBOmFiEp4npbQPDN9-Qc6Czoi04=H96YnUmLLBD-9VFQ@mail.gmail.com>

"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> ​The risk here is significantly reduced since the existing user-visible
> behavior is an error which presumably no one is relying upon.  Between that
> and being able to conform to the standard syntax for a long-standing
> feature I would say the benefit outweighs the cost and risk.

The risk you're ignoring is that this patch will break something that
*did* work before.  Given that the first version did exactly that,
I do not think that risk should be considered negligible.  I'm going
to change my vote for back-patching from -0.5 to -1.

			regards, tom lane




view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <12746.1526851005@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../12746.1526851005@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/12746.1526851005@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, david.g.johnston@gmail.com, pg@bowt.ie, vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com, andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk
  Subject: Re: Fix for FETCH FIRST syntax problems
  In-Reply-To: <12746.1526851005@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox