pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Getting rid of "unknown error" in dblink and postgres_fdw
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:22:09 -0500
Message-ID: <19852.1482366129@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02fa2d90-2efd-00bc-fefc-c23c00eb671e@joeconway.com>
References: <19872.1482338965@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<dfa45c48-659c-caa8-76de-06006707c3aa@joeconway.com>
	<21630.1482341251@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1312.1482343733@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<02fa2d90-2efd-00bc-fefc-c23c00eb671e@joeconway.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> I did notice that postgres_fdw has the following stanza that I don't see
> in dblink:

> 8<------------------
> /*
>  * If we don't get a message from the PGresult, try the PGconn.  This
>  * is needed because for connection-level failures, PQexec may just
>  * return NULL, not a PGresult at all.
>  */
> if (message_primary == NULL)
> 	message_primary = PQerrorMessage(conn);
> 8<------------------

> I wonder if the original issue on pgsql-bugs was a connection-level
> failure rather than OOM? Seems like dblink ought to do the same.

Oooh ... I had thought that code was in both, which was why I was having
a hard time explaining the OP's failure.  But I see you're right,
which provides a very straightforward explanation for the report.
I believe that if libpq is unable to malloc a PGresult, it will return
NULL but put an "out of memory" message into the PGconn's error buffer.
I had supposed that we'd capture and report the latter, but as the
dblink code stands, it won't.

In short, yes, please copy that bit into dblink.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <19852.1482366129@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../19852.1482366129@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/19852.1482366129@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mail@joeconway.com
  Subject: Re: Getting rid of "unknown error" in dblink and postgres_fdw
  In-Reply-To: <19852.1482366129@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox