From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 22:54:23 -0300
Message-ID: <20190211015423.GA16289@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13445.1549832789@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2019-Feb-10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > If we disregard the scenario were people downgrade across minor
> > versions, it's likely possible to produce SQL queries to transform from
> > the old arrangement to the new one, and include those in release notes
> > or a wiki page; not for this week's minors (ENOTIME) but maybe for the
> > next one.
>
> Dunno ... we couldn't force people to do that, so the server would have to
> be prepared to cope with either arrangement, which seems like an
> impossible mess.
True.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pg@bowt.ie
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
In-Reply-To: <20190211015423.GA16289@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox