From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: performance issue in remove_from_unowned_list()
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 17:09:23 -0300
Message-ID: <20190310200923.GA4108@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80c27103-99e4-1d0c-642c-d9f3b94aaa0a@2ndquadrant.com>
On 2019-Feb-07, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Attached is a WIP patch removing the optimization from DropRelationFiles
> and adding it to smgrDoPendingDeletes. This resolves the issue, at least
> in the cases I've been able to reproduce. But maybe we should deal with
> this issue earlier by ensuring the two lists are ordered the same way
> from the very beginning, somehow.
I noticed that this patch isn't in the commitfest. Are you planning to
push it soon?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: performance issue in remove_from_unowned_list()
In-Reply-To: <20190310200923.GA4108@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox