pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Subject: Re: Online checksums patch - once again
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:58:52 -0400
Message-ID: <20190930145852.GC8385@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABUevExL7VaUTm17qzw7PS64Uhopcwy+crMZqHPi-YkqgjUJzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABUevEwE3urLtwxxqdgd5O2oQz9J717ZzMbh+ziCSa5YLLU_BA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20190926194828.GA17211@alvherre.pgsql>
	<CABUevEyTp8OKUxV+-id0PLoB0sA+7d2uefAzYnq=Kb03V5r5PQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20190930124944.vn2c2y44ybxck6wa@development>
	<20190930145313.GB8385@momjian.us>
	<CABUevExL7VaUTm17qzw7PS64Uhopcwy+crMZqHPi-YkqgjUJzw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 04:57:41PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 4:53 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> 
>     On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 02:49:44PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>     > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:03:20PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>     > > Other than bots, this patch doesn't seem to have attracted any
>     reviewers
>     > > > this time around.  Perhaps you need to bribe someone?  (Maybe "how
>     sad
>     > > > your committer SSH key stopped working" would do?)
>     > > >
>     > >
>     > > Hmm. I don't think that's a bribe, that's a threat. However, maybe it
>     will
>     > > work.
>     > >
>     >
>     > IMHO the patch is ready to go - I think the global barrier solves the
>     > issue in the previous version, and that's the only problem I'm aware of.
>     > So +1 from me to go ahead and push it.
>     >
>     > And now please uncomment my commit SSH key again, please ;-)
> 
>     For adding cluster-level encryption to Postgres, the plan is to create a
>     standby that has encryption enabled, then switchover to it.  Is that a
>     method we support now for adding checksums to Postgres?  Do we need the
>     ability to do it in-place too?
> 
> 
> I definitely think we need the ability to do it in-place as well, yes. 

OK, just has to ask.  I think for encryption, for the first version, we
will do just replica-only changes.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +





view thread (87+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20190930145852.GC8385@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../20190930145852.GC8385@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20190930145852.GC8385@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, magnus@hagander.net, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, daniel@yesql.se
  Subject: Re: Online checksums patch - once again
  In-Reply-To: <20190930145852.GC8385@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox