pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Subject: Re: make tuplestore helper function
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 23:57:56 -0600
Message-ID: <20220216055756.GD31460@telsasoft.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CAAKRu_b-W8BqK6x57sqm=RfivGuU0=fHF9urv9_3onAMZT3r=w@mail.gmail.com >
References: <20211102202353.GG17618@telsasoft.com >
<CAAKRu_a-ZZTez9yn4EMDAQQgt1UFpFcTVr=MDxf-b75tZ9q8UQ@mail.gmail.com >
<20211108201338.GU17618@telsasoft.com >
<CAAKRu_b2rySeOC=zZDd-++N6AXTuL-uABpPKQgO8f2NV4j5dPw@mail.gmail.com >
<20211118182430.GO17618@telsasoft.com >
<CAAKRu_aQDmqRmDLE4qPSL-b0cPQA-ELkfkSBWtLgV6Y1Zp6yBQ@mail.gmail.com >
<20211217200419.GQ17618@telsasoft.com >
<CAAKRu_a5rBP2XV9JU9CtD=KB0GySXCJRDSramrVbW=LPMro_eA@mail.gmail.com >
<20220106005748.GT14051@telsasoft.com >
<CAAKRu_b-W8BqK6x57sqm=RfivGuU0=fHF9urv9_3onAMZT3r=w@mail.gmail.com >
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:19:33AM -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> > If the expectedDesc NULL check were an 0001 patch, then 0002 (the main patch)
> > would be even easier to review. Only foreign.c is different.
>
> I'll wait to do that if preferred by committer.
> Are you imagining that patch 0001 would only add the check for
> expectedDesc that is missing from pg_config() and text_to_table()?
Yes, that's what I meant, but I haven't been able to determine if a NULL check
should be added at all.
I found this commit message, which indicates that it shouldn't be used in every
case. I'm not clear when it should/not be used, though.
commit 60651e4cddbb77e8f1a0c7fc0be6a7e7bf626fe0
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sat Oct 28 14:02:21 2017 -0400
Support domains over composite types in PL/Perl.
In passing, don't insist on rsi->expectedDesc being set unless we
actually need it; this allows succeeding in a couple of cases where
PL/Perl functions returning setof composite would have failed before,
and makes the error message more apropos in other cases.
view thread (23+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <20220216055756.GD31460@telsasoft.com>
Permalink: ../20220216055756.GD31460@telsasoft.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/20220216055756.GD31460@telsasoft.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pryzby@telsasoft.com, melanieplageman@gmail.com, andres@anarazel.de, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, michael@paquier.xyz
Subject: Re: make tuplestore helper function
In-Reply-To: <20220216055756.GD31460@telsasoft.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox