From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Splitting up guc.c
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:10:00 +0200
Message-ID: <20220913091000.l4dam6w5euja3pua@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1778776.1663014026@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2022-Sep-12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I suspect people will have to manually reapply any changes in
> the GUC tables to guc_tables.c. That'll be the same amount of work
> for them whenever we commit this patch (unless theirs lands first,
> in which case I have to deal with it). The issue I think is
> whether it's politer to make that happen during a CF or between
> CFs.
Personally I would prefer that this kind of thing is done quickly rather
than delay it to some uncertain future. That way I can deal with it
straight ahead rather than living with the anxiety that it will land
later and I will have to deal with it then. I see no benefit in
waiting.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, ilmari@ilmari.org, andres@anarazel.de, michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Splitting up guc.c
In-Reply-To: <20220913091000.l4dam6w5euja3pua@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox