From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: a.akenteva@postgrespro.ru
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 11:21:26 -0500
Message-ID: <21764.1510244486@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171109160608.ix24ajduhlzeiz44@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20171109160608.ix24ajduhlzeiz44@alvherre.pgsql>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> I think odd coding this was introduced recently because of the
> pg_resetxlog -> pg_resetwal renaming.
Dunno about that, but certainly somebody fat-fingered a refactoring
there. The 9.6 code looks quite different but doesn't seem to be
doing anything silly.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, a.akenteva@postgrespro.ru
Subject: Re: A weird bit in pg_upgrade/exec.c
In-Reply-To: <21764.1510244486@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox