From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:11:42 -0500
Message-ID: <21925.1545171102@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2-WzkMmRkXsWaVZ+VEbKdcKRcTuxu5ogVVH1SARqVuTuQKHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH2-WzmYbkT6e9B1jWApV5HcApUZqC==yoC4VTi7TBs007Ki+g@mail.gmail.com>
<20181218212053.4vqcmmcicbzr2jyc@alvherre.pgsql>
<CAH2-WzkMmRkXsWaVZ+VEbKdcKRcTuxu5ogVVH1SARqVuTuQKHA@mail.gmail.com>
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 1:20 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I can reproduce the
>> reported problem without your patch by using that flag. Here's a
>> recipe:
> Interesting.
> Note that if the standard that we're going to hold a solution to here
> is "must produce sane output with --ignore-system-indexes", then my
> solution will not meet that standard.
Do you mean "same" output, or "sane" output? I'd certainly expect
the latter.
I think though that Alvaro was just offering this as a way to poke
at the posited bug in dependency.c without having to install your
whole patch.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pg@bowt.ie, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
In-Reply-To: <21925.1545171102@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox