From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:58:04 -0700
Message-ID: <271f899c54d112b353e009286af7c6cdb7c3d609.camel@j-davis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1854ffbf-f8eb-4bc3-b9f8-223bbf58c392@oss.nttdata.com>
References: <7cc52488-f876-4ad3-affd-6e4b0ef0cb09@eisentraut.org>
<aEMLzPQtjRbj2R7X@nathan>
<CA+TgmoactJEUHeXuxHLKNXHzm6-XrQFigPur-4nHTMFSiSRkiQ@mail.gmail.com>
<aErpuM6RXSlK1FBW@nathan>
<1854ffbf-f8eb-4bc3-b9f8-223bbf58c392@oss.nttdata.com>
On Fri, 2025-06-13 at 09:39 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> By the way, if we keep --with-statistics in pg_dump, are we planning
> to
> continue using the --with-xxx naming pattern for new options that
> specify extra data to dump?
Good point. Now that we are getting rid of some of the other options,
we don't need to worry about consistency with them, and I think we
should just use "--statistics".
Regards,
Jeff Davis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql@j-davis.com, masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, nathandbossart@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, peter@eisentraut.org
Subject: Re: pg_dump --with-* options
In-Reply-To: <271f899c54d112b353e009286af7c6cdb7c3d609.camel@j-davis.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox