pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:54:44 -0500
Message-ID: <475.1550242484@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <422e0383-79e1-7c10-5771-1e232e3349ca@2ndquadrant.com>
References: <16646.1549770618@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<E7790843-B885-492B-8537-CC9FB39D5F97@yesql.se>
	<11413.1549835730@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<6f1657f9-c58c-ba28-0013-d36a6f6fd246@2ndquadrant.com>
	<6418.1549895430@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<e265e2ae-e92e-5ab9-dc68-60b6cb047b3d@2ndquadrant.com>
	<422e0383-79e1-7c10-5771-1e232e3349ca@2ndquadrant.com>

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-02-15 14:32, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> test event_trigger                ... ok      128 ms
>> test fast_default                 ... ok      173 ms
>> test stats                        ... ok      637 ms

That looks reasonable, although on machines where test runtimes run
into the tens of seconds, there's not going to be nearly as much
whitespace as this example suggests.

> We should also strive to align "FAILED" properly.

Hmm.  The reasonable ways to accomplish that look to be either
(a) pad "ok" to the width of "FAILED", or (b) rely on emitting a tab.
I don't much like either, especially from the localization angle.
One should also note that FAILED often comes along with additional
verbiage, such as "(ignored)" or a note about process exit status;
so I think making such cases line up totally neatly is a lost cause
anyway.

How do you feel about letting it do this:

      int4                         ... ok      128 ms
      int8                         ... FAILED      153 ms
      oid                          ... ok      163 ms
      float4                       ... ok      231 ms

			regards, tom lane




view thread (25+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <475.1550242484@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../475.1550242484@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/475.1550242484@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, daniel@yesql.se, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress
  In-Reply-To: <475.1550242484@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox