pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 07:42:36 -0700
Message-ID: <5571B55C.7050009@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+Tgmob6EShOAUc-be9OXOvTA9VhovqOdLuZ-_V=xXobgLh9Eg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <55674016.80005@commandprompt.com>
	<20150528193556.GH26667@tamriel.snowman.net>
	<5567C5EB.3070703@gmx.net>
	<5567CB9E.1030502@commandprompt.com>
	<20150529031004.GU26667@tamriel.snowman.net>
	<5567DDBA.8020403@commandprompt.com>
	<CAECtzeWrOT7LgNABk9V=CWCATHYQMxLdE9etG3iHGADqa8kOQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.10.1505290750050.24520@sto>
	<55686D84.4040202@commandprompt.com>
	<20150529143026.GV26667@tamriel.snowman.net>
	<CA+Tgmoa+hEZUmXCp+KqsZdMRdRVM36KgWNqd-momdmKVd-UU9Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5570739E.3020605@commandprompt.com>
	<CA+TgmoY3VW=tdPx1AsHW1LOnztojkGxLfVXLiW5AoOPTqs=5ug@mail.gmail.com>
	<55709181.1010807@commandprompt.com>
	<CA+TgmobcZ8YHeY=L-Z6pRpane7iMZXZERjQuiSQ_wAZiamgFjA@mail.gmail.com>
	<55709A0B.1000605@commandprompt.com>
	<CA+Tgmob6EShOAUc-be9OXOvTA9VhovqOdLuZ-_V=xXobgLh9Eg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>


On 06/05/2015 04:56 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
somewhere else.  At least not that I can see.
>
>> 4. Eliminate the EGO of saying "I have a contrib module in core"
>
> I've got multiple major features in core.  Any ego I may have about my
> PostgreSQL contributions is not based on pg_prewarm.

This was worded badly by me. This isn't about your ego, it is about the 
mysticism surrounding the idea that "they have a feature in core". It is 
really last on the list and not really important to this discussion.

>
>> 1. 15 years of the same argument (current source: pg_audit)
>
> The argument about pg_audit has little to do with contrib.  It is
> primarily about code quality, and secondarily about whether one
> committer can go do something unliterally when a long list of other
> committers and contributors have expressed doubts about it.
>

The argument was about whether it should be in contrib, code quality or 
not. If contrib didn't exist and we accepted that extensions are an 
outside core thing, the argument never would have happened.

JD



-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (84+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5571B55C.7050009@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../5571B55C.7050009@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5571B55C.7050009@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, sfrost@snowman.net
  Subject: Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
  In-Reply-To: <5571B55C.7050009@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox