pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: ArchiveEntry optional arguments refactoring
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:32:06 -0500
Message-ID: <5606.1548264726@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123172328.b6trpdpcbzbq4unv@alap3.anarazel.de>
References: <20190123164734.cnt7ho34ygwsav7z@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<201901231658.fls2whf2xypv@alvherre.pgsql>
	<20190123172328.b6trpdpcbzbq4unv@alap3.anarazel.de>

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-01-23 13:58:07 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> It does.  How does pgindent behave with it?

> It craps out:
> Error@3649: Unbalanced parens
> Warning@3657: Extra )

> But that can be worked around with something like

>         te = ArchiveEntry(fout, tdinfo->dobj.catId, tdinfo->dobj.dumpId,
>                           ARCHIVE_ARGS(.tag = tbinfo->dobj.name,
>                                        .namespace = tbinfo->dobj.namespace->dobj.name,
>                                        .owner = tbinfo->rolname,
>                                        .desc = "TABLE DATA",
>                                        .section = SECTION_DATA,
>                                        .copyStmt = copyStmt,
>                                        .deps = &(tbinfo->dobj.dumpId),
>                                        .nDeps = 1,
>                                        .dumpFn = dumpFn,
>                                        .dumpArg = tdinfo,
>                                        ));
> which looks mildly simpler too.

That looks fairly reasonable from here, but I'd suggest
ARCHIVE_OPTS rather than ARCHIVE_ARGS.

Can we omit the initial dots if we use a wrapper macro?  Would it be
a good idea to do so (I'm not really sure)?

			regards, tom lane




view thread (28+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5606.1548264726@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../5606.1548264726@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5606.1548264726@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, 9erthalion6@gmail.com, amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: ArchiveEntry optional arguments refactoring
  In-Reply-To: <5606.1548264726@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox