From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: plperl tests fail with latest Perl 5.36
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 13:30:22 -0400
Message-ID: <630586.1654104622@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoaQzR27nykS2nvgLbw9q8OO9U_NqoK+SfVC4S=mUMN9hA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <564579.1654093326@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<87bkvcmn9i.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org>
<578876.1654098042@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<CA+TgmoaQzR27nykS2nvgLbw9q8OO9U_NqoK+SfVC4S=mUMN9hA@mail.gmail.com>
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 11:40 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Looks reasonable to me, but I'm hardly a Perl monk. Anybody have
>> a different opinion?
> Well, it falsifies the immediately preceding comment, but I think it's
> fine otherwise.
Duh, right, will fix.
This seems appropriate to back-patch as far as 9.2, since AFAIK there's
not currently anything that breaks plperl in the out-of-support branches.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, ilmari@ilmari.org, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: plperl tests fail with latest Perl 5.36
In-Reply-To: <630586.1654104622@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox