public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Daria Shanina <[email protected]>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: autoprewarm_dump_now
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 13:24:16 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoYCMwr1BxE5ApJoxkqxrzSSvS509xqow4HY1-y90HjnJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMp4U1cDJzb96KJXT-hNuf7L4KaYUiXWs6KSe01so--mBoop8g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAAKRu_YyuqbRaVO-zkoeRLFeNtF_jX-faGSGH4h3JB6ckORWMg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmobRMXwFg4AUZ96FvXALFkN8H7KBqhCp-CtMS83RuKXG3A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMp4U1c8S7oTsuNahvkFLR7OeSxnamtOHgey=rcMi=Y7cWg7ng@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAMp4U1doDjku1675GRRtpwML2aGsYqjC0SZBm7xozGfQiBfCug@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmoYCMwr1BxE5ApJoxkqxrzSSvS509xqow4HY1-y90HjnJA@mail.gmail.com>
Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> I think the proposed patch should be committed and back-patched, after
> fixing it so that it's pgindent-clean and adding a comment. Does
> anyone have strong objection to that?
Not here. I do wonder if we can't find a more memory-efficient way,
but I concur that any such change would likely not be back-patch
material.
regards, tom lane
view thread (15+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: autoprewarm_dump_now
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox