public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
To: Peter Smith <[email protected]>
To: vignesh C <[email protected]>
Cc: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:36:18 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHut+PuHs=52Ag5RH2OExm8Qg6sfBkak4OY7onfiqYZ+HJ-iwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHut+Pv8Oa7v06hJb3+HzCtM2u-3oHWMdvXVHhvi7ofB83pNbg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwa9JtoCBVc6CJb7NC5FqMeEAy_A8X4H8t6kVaw7fz9LTw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+Pv5Efz1TLWOLSoFvoyC0mq+s92yFSd534ctWSdjEFtKCw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwYkM5UZT+6tG+NgZvDcd5VavS+xNHsGsWC8jS-KJsxh7w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PvUdTdK5UGMXkm_U+1Cdez9y6x057GTrb3XSChybjdS3w@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAKFQuwbQHgBJ4zSA_oKfO6qKvy3S16hx0HuMQGpxmm53MEQJqg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PvYpLyEGrw=6gnakU7xNfAWHeNKqFbcDghfSjOdDutTjQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwYUCsugVg5cOgezh52W_2MwqMewXkr79DnxUVJ3Cs2dvA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwby7xWHek8=6UPaNXrhGA-i0B2zMOmBoGHgc4yaO8NH_w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PuHhrBrYQ2cWkRuAuN6S1mAo0iEsnJSHcfOXazkF8xE8g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CALDaNm3Z0sti4R7PuD0npA7tQoWRwK8dAh=QxWf+nU0ZGC=_Ww@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PuHs=52Ag5RH2OExm8Qg6sfBkak4OY7onfiqYZ+HJ-iwQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 11.01.23 07:11, Peter Smith wrote:
> v9-0003 --> v10-0001
>
>> I'm not sure if anything is pending for v9-0003, if there is something
>> pending, please post an updated patch for the same.
>
> Thanks for the reminder. PSA v10.
So this patch changes some sections describing system views to
refentry's. What is the reason for that? refentry's are basically man
pages; do we want man pages for each system view?
Maybe (*), but then we should also do the same to all the other system
views, all the system catalogs, everything else. Just changing a few in
a single place seems odd.
(*) -- but also maybe not?
view thread (3+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox