agora inbox for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed[PATCH v3 1/4] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
210+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* [PATCH v3 1/4] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
LGTM.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer()
@ 2025-09-02 15:00 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Melanie Plageman @ 2025-09-02 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
@@ -731,6 +741,13 @@ StrategyRejectBuffer(BufferAccessStrategy
strategy, BufferDesc *buf, bool from_r
strategy->buffers[strategy->current] !=3D BufferDescriptorGetBuffe=
r(buf))
return false;
+ buf_state =3D LockBufHdr(buf);
+ lsn =3D BufferGetLSN(buf);
+ UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state);
+
+ if (!XLogNeedsFlush(lsn))
+ return true;
I think this should return false.
I am planning to review the other patches later and this is for the
first patch only.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v46 3/7] Use BulkInsertState when copying data to the new heap.
@ 2026-03-11 14:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 210+ messages in thread
From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-03-11 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
It should make the copying more efficient. Besides that, buffer access
strategy is involved this way.
This diff reverts the changes done in previous parts of the series to
reform_and_rewrite_tuple() and introduces a separate function
heap_insert_for_repack().
---
src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c | 110 +++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
index 0ba7c0df1fc..fa95deb46ea 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c
@@ -51,6 +51,11 @@
static void reform_and_rewrite_tuple(HeapTuple tuple,
Relation OldHeap, Relation NewHeap,
Datum *values, bool *isnull, RewriteState rwstate);
+static void heap_insert_for_repack(HeapTuple tuple, Relation OldHeap,
+ Relation NewHeap, Datum *values, bool *isnull,
+ BulkInsertState bistate);
+static HeapTuple reform_tuple(HeapTuple tuple, Relation OldHeap,
+ Relation NewHeap, Datum *values, bool *isnull);
static bool SampleHeapTupleVisible(TableScanDesc scan, Buffer buffer,
HeapTuple tuple,
@@ -703,6 +708,7 @@ heapam_relation_copy_for_cluster(Relation OldHeap, Relation NewHeap,
double *tups_recently_dead)
{
RewriteState rwstate = NULL;
+ BulkInsertState bistate = NULL;
IndexScanDesc indexScan;
TableScanDesc tableScan;
HeapScanDesc heapScan;
@@ -738,6 +744,8 @@ heapam_relation_copy_for_cluster(Relation OldHeap, Relation NewHeap,
if (!concurrent)
rwstate = begin_heap_rewrite(OldHeap, NewHeap, OldestXmin,
*xid_cutoff, *multi_cutoff);
+ else
+ bistate = GetBulkInsertState();
/* Set up sorting if wanted */
@@ -967,8 +975,12 @@ heapam_relation_copy_for_cluster(Relation OldHeap, Relation NewHeap,
};
int64 ct_val[2];
- reform_and_rewrite_tuple(tuple, OldHeap, NewHeap,
- values, isnull, rwstate);
+ if (!concurrent)
+ reform_and_rewrite_tuple(tuple, OldHeap, NewHeap,
+ values, isnull, rwstate);
+ else
+ heap_insert_for_repack(tuple, OldHeap, NewHeap,
+ values, isnull, bistate);
/*
* In indexscan mode and also VACUUM FULL, report increase in
@@ -1016,10 +1028,15 @@ heapam_relation_copy_for_cluster(Relation OldHeap, Relation NewHeap,
break;
n_tuples += 1;
- reform_and_rewrite_tuple(tuple,
- OldHeap, NewHeap,
- values, isnull,
- rwstate);
+ if (!concurrent)
+ reform_and_rewrite_tuple(tuple,
+ OldHeap, NewHeap,
+ values, isnull,
+ rwstate);
+ else
+ heap_insert_for_repack(tuple, OldHeap, NewHeap,
+ values, isnull, bistate);
+
/* Report n_tuples */
pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_REPACK_HEAP_TUPLES_INSERTED,
n_tuples);
@@ -1031,6 +1048,8 @@ heapam_relation_copy_for_cluster(Relation OldHeap, Relation NewHeap,
/* Write out any remaining tuples, and fsync if needed */
if (rwstate)
end_heap_rewrite(rwstate);
+ if (bistate)
+ FreeBulkInsertState(bistate);
/* Clean up */
pfree(values);
@@ -2423,56 +2442,71 @@ heapam_scan_sample_next_tuple(TableScanDesc scan, SampleScanState *scanstate,
* SET WITHOUT OIDS.
*
* So, we must reconstruct the tuple from component Datums.
- *
- * If rwstate=NULL, use simple_heap_insert() instead of rewriting - in that
- * case we still need to deform/form the tuple. TODO Shouldn't we rename the
- * function, as might not do any rewrite?
*/
static void
reform_and_rewrite_tuple(HeapTuple tuple,
Relation OldHeap, Relation NewHeap,
Datum *values, bool *isnull, RewriteState rwstate)
+{
+ HeapTuple copiedTuple;
+
+ copiedTuple = reform_tuple(tuple, OldHeap, NewHeap, values, isnull);
+
+ /* The heap rewrite module does the rest */
+ rewrite_heap_tuple(rwstate, tuple, copiedTuple);
+
+ heap_freetuple(copiedTuple);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Insert tuple when processing REPACK CONCURRENTLY.
+ *
+ * rewriteheap.c is not used in the CONCURRENTLY case because it'd be
+ * difficult to do the same in the catch-up phase (as the logical
+ * decoding does not provide us with sufficient visibility
+ * information). Thus we must use heap_insert() both during the
+ * catch-up and here.
+ *
+ * We pass the NO_LOGICAL flag to heap_insert() in order to skip logical
+ * decoding: as soon as REPACK CONCURRENTLY swaps the relation files, it drops
+ * this relation, so no logical replication subscription should need the data.
+ *
+ * BulkInsertState is used because many tuples are inserted in the typical
+ * case.
+ */
+static void
+heap_insert_for_repack(HeapTuple tuple, Relation OldHeap, Relation NewHeap,
+ Datum *values, bool *isnull, BulkInsertState bistate)
+{
+ tuple = reform_tuple(tuple, OldHeap, NewHeap, values, isnull);
+
+ heap_insert(NewHeap, tuple, GetCurrentCommandId(true),
+ HEAP_INSERT_NO_LOGICAL, bistate);
+
+ heap_freetuple(tuple);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Deform tuple, set values of dropped columns to NULL, form a new tuple and
+ * return it.
+ */
+static HeapTuple
+reform_tuple(HeapTuple tuple, Relation OldHeap, Relation NewHeap,
+ Datum *values, bool *isnull)
{
TupleDesc oldTupDesc = RelationGetDescr(OldHeap);
TupleDesc newTupDesc = RelationGetDescr(NewHeap);
- HeapTuple copiedTuple;
int i;
heap_deform_tuple(tuple, oldTupDesc, values, isnull);
- /* Be sure to null out any dropped columns */
for (i = 0; i < newTupDesc->natts; i++)
{
if (TupleDescCompactAttr(newTupDesc, i)->attisdropped)
isnull[i] = true;
}
- copiedTuple = heap_form_tuple(newTupDesc, values, isnull);
-
- if (rwstate)
- /* The heap rewrite module does the rest */
- rewrite_heap_tuple(rwstate, tuple, copiedTuple);
- else
- {
- /*
- * Insert tuple when processing REPACK CONCURRENTLY.
- *
- * rewriteheap.c is not used in the CONCURRENTLY case because it'd be
- * difficult to do the same in the catch-up phase (as the logical
- * decoding does not provide us with sufficient visibility
- * information). Thus we must use heap_insert() both during the
- * catch-up and here.
- *
- * The following is like simple_heap_insert() except that we pass the
- * flag to skip logical decoding: as soon as REPACK CONCURRENTLY swaps
- * the relation files, it drops this relation, so no logical
- * replication subscription should need the data.
- */
- heap_insert(NewHeap, copiedTuple, GetCurrentCommandId(true),
- HEAP_INSERT_NO_LOGICAL, NULL);
- }
-
- heap_freetuple(copiedTuple);
+ return heap_form_tuple(newTupDesc, values, isnull);
}
/*
--
2.47.3
--mdsv5bdgfjjj6d77
Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="v46-0004-rename-cluster.c-h-to-repack.c-h.patch"
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 210+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-11 14:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 210+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v3 1/4] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2025-09-02 15:00 [PATCH v2 1/9] Refactor goto into for loop in GetVictimBuffer() Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
2026-03-11 14:20 [PATCH v46 3/7] Use BulkInsertState when copying data to the new heap. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox