From: Tony Simopoulos <karkalis@earthling.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 11:15:26 -0400
Message-ID: <020b01c03e96$674d2760$0382a8c0@metavera.com> (raw)
References: <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B461@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk>
<4983.972391441@sss.pgh.pa.us>
sorry,
i must have missed something. when did outer join's start working? is there a patch that i can build?
tonys.
> That's a good thought. It'd be a useful practice to review such
> standard queries from time to time anyway. For example, now that
> outer joins work, a lot of psql's backslash-command queries could
> be simplified (don't need the UNION ALL WITH SELECT NULL hack).
>
> Anyone have time to work up a list?
>
> regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: karkalis@earthling.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
In-Reply-To: <020b01c03e96$674d2760$0382a8c0@metavera.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox