From: Mindaugas <mind@bi.lt>
To: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Core 2 or Opteron
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:05:24 +0200
Message-ID: <01b701c719ef$9e73b610$f20214ac@bite.lt> (raw)
References: <019401c719e9$07449d00$f20214ac@bite.lt>
<4577ED1C.1040600@tweakers.net>
> These benchmarks are all done using 64 bit linux:
> http://tweakers.net/reviews/646
I see. Thanks.
Now about 2 core vs 4 core Woodcrest. For HP DL360 I see similarly priced
dual core 5160@3GHz and four core E5320@1.86Ghz. According to article's
scaling data PostgreSQL performance should be similar (1.86GHz * 2 * 80% =
~3GHz). And quad core has slightly slower FSB (1066 vs 1333).
So it looks like more likely dual core 5160 Woodrest is the way to go if I
want "ultimate" performance on two sockets?
Besides that I think it should consume a bit less power!?
Mindaugas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mind@bi.lt, acmmailing@tweakers.net
Subject: Re: Core 2 or Opteron
In-Reply-To: <01b701c719ef$9e73b610$f20214ac@bite.lt>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox