From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc: H.J. Sanders <hjs@rmax.nl>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:59:42 -0500
Message-ID: <1160675982.6181.61.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10362.1160664260@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <GMEAJIDMNDKCIHMMHDFLEEOHEGAA.hjs@rmax.nl>
<452E11FB.7070704@paradise.net.nz>
<20061012135248.GS28647@nasby.net>
<10362.1160664260@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 09:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net> writes:
> > If someone's going to commit to putting effort into improving the
> > planner then that's wonderful. But I can't recall any significant
> > planner improvements since min/max (which I'd argue was more of a bug
> > fix than an improvement).
>
> Hmph. Apparently I've wasted most of the last five years.
I appreciate the work, and trust me, I've noticed the changes in the
query planner over time.
Thanks for the hard work, and I'm sure there are plenty of other
thankful people too.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jim@nasby.net, markir@paradise.net.nz, hjs@rmax.nl
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
In-Reply-To: <1160675982.6181.61.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox