From: Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>
To: Justin Pitts <justinpitts@gmail.com>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
Cc: Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL - Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Testing FusionIO
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:18:20 -0400
Message-ID: <1268831900.4412.1739.camel@bnicholson-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86675EB2-8CC8-4159-91DD-27BB5E6AC1C3@gmail.com>
References: <1268059301.2098.87.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org>
<0A41C50D-3F29-4021-A959-95AF955D570F@silentmedia.com>
<1268829058.2137.31.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org>
<1268831008.4412.1736.camel@bnicholson-desktop>
<86675EB2-8CC8-4159-91DD-27BB5E6AC1C3@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:11 -0400, Justin Pitts wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Brad Nicholson wrote:
>
> > I've been hearing bad things from some folks about the quality of the
> > FusionIO drives from a durability standpoint.
>
> Can you be more specific about that? Durability over what time frame? How many devices in the sample set? How did FusionIO deal with the issue?
I didn't get any specifics - as we are looking at other products. It
did center around how FusionIO did wear-leveling though.
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: bnichols@ca.afilias.info, justinpitts@gmail.com, devrim@gunduz.org, bench@silentmedia.com
Subject: Re: Testing FusionIO
In-Reply-To: <1268831900.4412.1739.camel@bnicholson-desktop>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox