pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Pitts <justinpitts@gmail.com>
To: Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
Cc: Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL - Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Testing FusionIO
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:11:15 -0400
Message-ID: <86675EB2-8CC8-4159-91DD-27BB5E6AC1C3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268831008.4412.1736.camel@bnicholson-desktop>
References: <1268059301.2098.87.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org>
	<0A41C50D-3F29-4021-A959-95AF955D570F@silentmedia.com>
	<1268829058.2137.31.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org>
	<1268831008.4412.1736.camel@bnicholson-desktop>

On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Brad Nicholson wrote:

> I've been hearing bad things from some folks about the quality of the
> FusionIO drives from a durability standpoint.

Can you be more specific about that? Durability over what time frame? How many devices in the sample set? How did FusionIO deal with the issue?


view thread (17+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <86675EB2-8CC8-4159-91DD-27BB5E6AC1C3@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../86675EB2-8CC8-4159-91DD-27BB5E6AC1C3@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/86675EB2-8CC8-4159-91DD-27BB5E6AC1C3@gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: justinpitts@gmail.com, bnichols@ca.afilias.info, devrim@gunduz.org, bench@silentmedia.com
  Subject: Re: Testing FusionIO
  In-Reply-To: <86675EB2-8CC8-4159-91DD-27BB5E6AC1C3@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox