From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL?
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:20:56 -0400
Message-ID: <20050714132056.GU19080@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42D65778.7010500@p0f.net>
References: <1121322821.6719.0.camel@noodles>
<758d5e7f05071401034665841c@mail.gmail.com>
<42D65778.7010500@p0f.net>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:15:52PM +0200, Grega Bremec wrote:
>I'm curious as to what this means - did they have problems integrating
>it into their toolchain or are there actual problems going on in jfs
>currently?
I've found jfs to be the least stable linux filesystem and won't allow
it anywhere near an important system. YMMV.
Mike Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL?
In-Reply-To: <20050714132056.GU19080@mathom.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox