pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tim@proximity.com.au
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: SAN performance mystery
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:16:35 +1200
Message-ID: <44973053.4080906@paradise.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060619102430.GD3303@mathom.us>
References: <4491D61B.9040507@proximity.com.au>
	<1150408614.26538.95.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
	<449677EB.50609@proximity.com.au>
	<20060619102430.GD3303@mathom.us>

Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:09:47PM +1000, Tim Allen wrote:
>> Certainly, the read performance of the SATA disk still beats the SAN, 
>> and there is no way to lie about read performance.
> 
> Sure there is: you have the data cached in system RAM. I find it real  
> hard to believe that you can sustain 161MB/s off a single SATA disk.
> 

Agreed - approx 60-70Mb/s seems to be the ballpark for modern SATA 
drives, so get get 161Mb/s you would need about 3 of them striped 
together (or a partially cached file as indicated).

What is interesting is that (presumably) the same test is getting such 
uninspiring results on the SAN...

Having said that, I've been there too, about 4 years ago with a SAN that 
had several 6 disk RAID5 arrays, and the best sequential *read* 
performance we ever saw from them was about 50Mb/s. I recall trying to 
get performance data from the vendor - only to be told that if we were 
doing benchmarks - could they have our results when we were finished!

regards

Mark




view thread (26+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <44973053.4080906@paradise.net.nz>
Permalink:  ../44973053.4080906@paradise.net.nz/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/44973053.4080906@paradise.net.nz

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: markir@paradise.net.nz, tim@proximity.com.au, mstone+postgres@mathom.us
  Subject: Re: SAN performance mystery
  In-Reply-To: <44973053.4080906@paradise.net.nz>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox