From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Cc: H.J. Sanders <hjs@rmax.nl>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:07:32 +1300
Message-ID: <452EBCA4.4030607@paradise.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10362.1160664260@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <GMEAJIDMNDKCIHMMHDFLEEOHEGAA.hjs@rmax.nl>
<452E11FB.7070704@paradise.net.nz>
<20061012135248.GS28647@nasby.net>
<10362.1160664260@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net> writes:
>> If someone's going to commit to putting effort into improving the
>> planner then that's wonderful. But I can't recall any significant
>> planner improvements since min/max (which I'd argue was more of a bug
>> fix than an improvement).
>
> Hmph. Apparently I've wasted most of the last five years.
>
In my opinion your on-going well thought out planner improvements are
*exactly* the approach we need to keep doing...
Cheers
Mark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: markir@paradise.net.nz, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jim@nasby.net, hjs@rmax.nl
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
In-Reply-To: <452EBCA4.4030607@paradise.net.nz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox