pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedindexes ignored when querying the master table
2011-05-06 21:13 UTC Thomas Hägi <th@refusion.com>
` Re: indexes ignored when querying the master table
2011-05-09 07:57 UTC Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
` Re: indexes ignored when querying the master table
2011-05-09 11:45 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: indexes ignored when querying the master table
2011-05-10 09:20 UTC Thomas Hägi <th@refusion.com>
[4+ messages in thread]
good performance benchmark
2011-05-09 20:41 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: good performance benchmark
2011-05-09 23:23 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in test
2011-05-09 18:06 UTC Marcus Engene <mengpg2@engene.se>
` Re: wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in test
2011-05-09 18:48 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in test
2011-05-09 18:57 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in test
2011-05-09 19:11 UTC Marcus Engene <mengpg2@engene.se>
` Re: wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in test
2011-05-09 19:59 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: wildcard makes seq scan on prod db but not in test
2011-05-09 21:25 UTC Marcus Engene <mengpg2@engene.se>
[6+ messages in thread]
REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-03-19 03:07 UTC Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-03-19 04:58 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-03-19 05:30 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-03-20 08:04 UTC Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-03-21 13:28 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-03-22 02:48 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-17 15:30 UTC Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-17 15:44 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-17 15:45 UTC Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-17 16:09 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-17 16:59 UTC Phoenix <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-17 18:13 UTC Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-17 18:30 UTC Shashank Tripathi <shanx@shanx.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-17 18:38 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-18 05:14 UTC Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-18 05:19 UTC Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-18 06:39 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-18 06:42 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-18 07:26 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-18 07:35 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-18 07:38 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-18 07:45 UTC Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-18 07:48 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-18 11:15 UTC Sethu Prasad <sethuprasad.in@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-18 15:15 UTC tv@fuzzy.cz
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-23 19:44 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-30 08:07 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-30 09:26 UTC Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-04-30 14:34 UTC Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-05-04 13:28 UTC Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
` Re: REINDEX takes half a day (and still not complete!)
2011-05-06 15:15 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
[31+ messages in thread]
VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
2011-04-28 03:33 UTC HSIEN-WEN CHU <hsienwen.chu@googlemail.com>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
2011-04-28 13:25 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
2011-04-29 00:14 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
2011-04-30 04:47 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
2011-04-30 08:51 UTC Hsien-Wen Chu <chu.hsien.wen@gmail.com>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
2011-05-05 17:53 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: VX_CONCURRENT flag on vxfs( 5.1 or later) for performance for postgresql?
2011-05-06 10:53 UTC Dimitri <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>
[7+ messages in thread]
Poor query plan chosen in 9.0.3 vs 8.3.7
2011-05-05 17:43 UTC Brian Connolly <bconn@labkey.com>
` Re: Poor query plan chosen in 9.0.3 vs 8.3.7
2011-05-05 19:54 UTC Brian Connolly <bconn@labkey.com>
` Re: Poor query plan chosen in 9.0.3 vs 8.3.7
2011-05-05 20:01 UTC Bosco Rama <postgres@boscorama.com>
` Re: Poor query plan chosen in 9.0.3 vs 8.3.7
2011-05-05 20:27 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
[4+ messages in thread]
ask the database engine tuning on the server
2011-05-05 01:18 UTC Didik Prasetyo <prasetyodidik62@yahoo.com>
` Re: ask the database engine tuning on the server
2011-05-05 18:07 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
[2+ messages in thread]
Explicit joins
2011-05-05 06:04 UTC Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Explicit joins
2011-05-05 17:16 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
[2+ messages in thread]
amazon ec2
2011-05-03 18:48 UTC Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-03 19:41 UTC Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-03 19:43 UTC Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-03 20:09 UTC Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-03 20:48 UTC Mark Rostron <mrostron@ql2.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-03 20:52 UTC Greg Spiegelberg <gspiegelberg@gmail.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-03 20:58 UTC david@lang.hm
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-03 21:39 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-03 22:39 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-03 22:44 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-04 13:05 UTC Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-04 14:04 UTC Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-05 00:02 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-05 00:12 UTC david@lang.hm
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-05 00:21 UTC Denis de Bernardy <ddebernardy@yahoo.com>
` Re: amazon ec2
2011-05-05 07:49 UTC Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
[16+ messages in thread]
Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-23 17:12 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-23 17:35 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-23 18:02 UTC Justin Pitts <justinpitts@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-23 20:29 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-23 20:46 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-23 21:00 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-23 21:08 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-24 00:05 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-24 08:44 UTC Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-24 18:41 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-24 20:30 UTC Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-24 22:23 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-25 09:43 UTC Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-25 14:12 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-25 14:24 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-25 14:41 UTC Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-25 17:55 UTC Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-25 22:43 UTC Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-03-26 01:03 UTC Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-04-19 14:22 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-04-19 14:29 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-04-20 01:50 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-04-23 16:11 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
2011-05-04 15:40 UTC Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
[24+ messages in thread]
row estimate very wrong for array type
2011-05-04 13:40 UTC Denis de Bernardy <ddebernardy@yahoo.com>
` Re: row estimate very wrong for array type
2011-05-04 14:12 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: row estimate very wrong for array type
2011-05-04 14:42 UTC Denis de Bernardy <ddebernardy@yahoo.com>
` Re: row estimate very wrong for array type
2011-05-04 14:56 UTC Denis de Bernardy <ddebernardy@yahoo.com>
[4+ messages in thread]
Order of tables
2011-04-28 09:20 UTC Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Order of tables
2011-04-28 12:30 UTC Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
` Re: Order of tables
2011-04-28 12:33 UTC Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
` Re: Order of tables
2011-04-29 10:50 UTC Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Order of tables
2011-05-04 05:23 UTC Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Order of tables
2011-05-04 05:26 UTC Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Order of tables
2011-05-04 05:29 UTC Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
` Re: Order of tables
2011-05-04 05:30 UTC Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
[8+ messages in thread]
pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
2011-04-29 12:46 UTC Jorgen <jrm@kms.dk>
` Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
2011-04-30 01:27 UTC Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
` Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
2011-04-30 01:28 UTC Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
` Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
2011-05-03 05:32 UTC Jorgen <jrm@kms.dk>
` Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
2011-05-03 07:29 UTC Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
` Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
2011-05-03 08:16 UTC Jorgen <jrm@kms.dk>
[6+ messages in thread]
8.4.7, incorrect estimate
2011-04-29 18:24 UTC Wayne Conrad <wayne@databill.com>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
2011-04-29 19:12 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
2011-04-29 19:33 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
2011-04-29 20:58 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
2011-05-02 13:19 UTC Wayne Conrad <wconrad@yagni.com>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
2011-05-02 15:11 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
2011-05-02 16:04 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: 8.4.7, incorrect estimate
2011-05-02 16:14 UTC Wayne Conrad <wconrad@yagni.com>
[8+ messages in thread]
The right SHMMAX and FILE_MAX
2011-05-01 06:48 UTC Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: The right SHMMAX and FILE_MAX
2011-05-01 17:18 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: The right SHMMAX and FILE_MAX
2011-05-01 19:38 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
` Re: The right SHMMAX and FILE_MAX
2011-05-02 04:53 UTC Adarsh Sharma <adarsh.sharma@orkash.com>
` Re: The right SHMMAX and FILE_MAX
2011-05-02 09:06 UTC Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
` Re: The right SHMMAX and FILE_MAX
2011-05-02 10:50 UTC Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
` Re: The right SHMMAX and FILE_MAX
2011-05-02 11:01 UTC Adarsh Sharma <adarsh.sharma@orkash.com>
` Re: The right SHMMAX and FILE_MAX
2011-05-02 15:18 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
[8+ messages in thread]
stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-04-30 16:56 UTC Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-04-30 17:27 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-04-30 17:58 UTC Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-04-30 18:04 UTC Pierre C <lists@peufeu.com>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-04-30 18:14 UTC Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-04-30 18:24 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-04-30 18:36 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-04-30 21:15 UTC Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-04-30 21:22 UTC Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-04-30 22:11 UTC Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-04-30 22:29 UTC Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-05-01 00:12 UTC Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-05-01 01:00 UTC Samuel Gendler <sgendler@ideasculptor.com>
` Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows
2011-05-01 23:31 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
[14+ messages in thread]
Re: {Spam} Will shared_buffers crash a server
2011-04-29 10:37 UTC French, Martin <frenchm@cromwell.co.uk>
` Re: {Spam} Will shared_buffers crash a server
2011-05-01 16:18 UTC Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
[2+ messages in thread]
index usage on queries on inherited tables
2011-04-01 00:41 UTC Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>
` Re: index usage on queries on inherited tables
2011-04-27 20:32 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: index usage on queries on inherited tables
2011-04-27 21:11 UTC Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>
` Re: index usage on queries on inherited tables
2011-04-28 00:18 UTC Samuel Gendler <sgendler@ideasculptor.com>
` Re: index usage on queries on inherited tables
2011-04-28 02:18 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: index usage on queries on inherited tables
2011-04-29 22:53 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
[6+ messages in thread]
FUSION-IO io cards
2011-04-29 14:24 UTC Mark Steben <mark.steben@autorevenue.com>
` Re: FUSION-IO io cards
2011-04-29 14:33 UTC Stephen Cook <sclists@gmail.com>
` Re: FUSION-IO io cards
2011-04-29 14:40 UTC Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
` Re: FUSION-IO io cards
2011-04-29 14:45 UTC gnuoytr@rcn.com
` Re: FUSION-IO io cards
2011-04-29 14:54 UTC Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>
` Re: FUSION-IO io cards
2011-04-29 15:20 UTC Tyler Mills <tmills@pavlovmedia.com>
` Re: FUSION-IO io cards
2011-04-29 16:04 UTC Joachim Worringen <joachim.worringen@iathh.de>
` Re: FUSION-IO io cards
2011-04-29 16:23 UTC Justin Pitts <justinpitts@gmail.com>
` Re: FUSION-IO io cards
2011-04-29 16:52 UTC gnuoytr@rcn.com
` Re: FUSION-IO io cards
2011-04-29 19:03 UTC Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: FUSION-IO io cards
2011-04-29 19:15 UTC Joachim Worringen <joachim.worringen@iathh.de>
[11+ messages in thread]
Will shared_buffers crash a server
2011-04-29 07:13 UTC Qiang Wang <forest_qiang@yahoo.com>
` Re: Will shared_buffers crash a server
2011-04-29 07:42 UTC Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
` Re: Will shared_buffers crash a server
2011-04-29 07:48 UTC Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
` Re: Will shared_buffers crash a server
2011-04-29 10:34 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
[4+ messages in thread]
Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type.
2011-04-27 15:28 UTC Dhimant Patel <drp4kri@gmail.com>
` Re: Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type.
2011-04-27 16:11 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type.
2011-04-27 16:12 UTC Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda@truviso.com>
` Re: Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type.
2011-04-27 16:17 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type.
2011-04-27 16:46 UTC Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>
` Re: Query Performance with Indexes on Integer type vs. Date type.
2011-04-27 18:34 UTC Dhimant Patel <drp4kri@gmail.com>
[6+ messages in thread]
Time to put theory to the test?
2011-04-25 19:30 UTC J Sisson <sisson.j@gmail.com>
` Re: Time to put theory to the test?
2011-04-26 03:04 UTC Rob Wultsch <wultsch@gmail.com>
` Re: Time to put theory to the test?
2011-04-26 06:30 UTC Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
` Re: Time to put theory to the test?
2011-04-26 14:13 UTC J Sisson <sisson.j@gmail.com>
` Re: Time to put theory to the test?
2011-04-26 14:58 UTC Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
` Re: Time to put theory to the test?
2011-04-26 15:02 UTC Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
` Re: Time to put theory to the test?
2011-04-26 15:20 UTC gnuoytr@rcn.com
` Re: Time to put theory to the test?
2011-04-26 15:51 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Time to put theory to the test?
2011-04-26 15:54 UTC Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
` Re: Time to put theory to the test?
2011-04-26 17:04 UTC Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>
` Re: Time to put theory to the test?
2011-04-26 17:57 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
[11+ messages in thread]
optimizing a cpu-heavy query
2011-04-26 15:16 UTC Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
Slow deleting tables with foreign keys
2011-03-31 02:16 UTC Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer@linz.govt.nz>
` Re: Slow deleting tables with foreign keys
2011-03-31 14:54 UTC Bob Lunney <bob_lunney@yahoo.com>
` Re: Slow deleting tables with foreign keys
2011-03-31 19:43 UTC Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer@linz.govt.nz>
` Re: Slow deleting tables with foreign keys
2011-04-25 23:54 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
[4+ messages in thread]
%100 CPU on Windows Server 2003
2011-04-20 14:55 UTC Allen Sooredoo <Allen_Sooredoo@carrefour.com>
` Re: %100 CPU on Windows Server 2003
2011-04-21 06:01 UTC Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
` Re: %100 CPU on Windows Server 2003
2011-04-25 23:44 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
[3+ messages in thread]
[next (older)]
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox