pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Chambers <gwchamb@gmail.com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 8.4.1 distinct query WITHOUT order by
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:45:27 -0500
Message-ID: <302670f20912211945n1b6684e9xb304d4508766f117@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10912211453ybe3b4d6y87303e795e3115c1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <302670f20912211415n4fc73b04x19eebfb9ff0acd60@mail.gmail.com>
	<hgotd1$mei$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<dcc563d10912211453ybe3b4d6y87303e795e3115c1@mail.gmail.com>

> Yeah, if you're code base is that fragile, bandaging it up by jumping
> through hoops in pgsql is just putting off the inevitable when it (the
> code base) has to get recompiled someday anyway.

I appreciate (and agree with) the concern about the fragility of the
codebase.  The maintainer knows that anything except adding ORDER BY
is a kludge.

Now, the aforementioned notwithstanding...

Aside from disabling enable_hashagg (which, according to the
documentation, is performance-expensive), what other options do I
have?

What are the ramifications of renaming the table (containing 8000
rows) and creating a view of the same name?

Assuming it's possible, would the efficiency of a rule to rewrite the
query be an acceptable alternative?

Thanks in advance for any insight and suggestions!

-- Gary Chambers

/* Nothing fancy and nothing Microsoft! */



view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <302670f20912211945n1b6684e9xb304d4508766f117@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../302670f20912211945n1b6684e9xb304d4508766f117@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/302670f20912211945n1b6684e9xb304d4508766f117@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: gwchamb@gmail.com, scott.marlowe@gmail.com, spam_eater@gmx.net
  Subject: Re: 8.4.1 distinct query WITHOUT order by
  In-Reply-To: <302670f20912211945n1b6684e9xb304d4508766f117@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox