From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bertrand Petit <pgsql-sql@phoe.frmug.org>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:50:15 -0400
Message-ID: <5975.1061556615@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030822083232.C81672@memo.frmug.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0308201247550.6023-100000@frontlogic.com>
<18608.1061411539@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20030822083232.C81672@memo.frmug.org>
Bertrand Petit <pgsql-sql@phoe.frmug.org> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:32:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> against actual elapsed time (cf psql's \timing option) would tell.
> What is measured by the \timing option?
Elapsed time ... as seen by the client, of course.
> The figures reported
> are slightly larger than those loged when the log_duration parameter
> is true.
Yeah, that's what I'd expect, especially if there is a network hop
involved.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-sql@phoe.frmug.org
Subject: Re: "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b
In-Reply-To: <5975.1061556615@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox