public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
No checksums please
6+ messages / 4 participants
[nested] [flat]

* No checksums please
@ 2007-02-01 18:55  Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread

From: Greg Sabino Mullane @ 2007-02-01 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-www


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


Could we please turn off all the checksum stuff for the mailing lists?
It's causing every legitimate message to produce two or more entries
in the moderation queue: if I see one that is marked as a checksum,
I am simply discarding it. This may be causing legitimate messages
to get discarded, but other than becoming a human checksummer and
verifying the content of every message in the queue versus what's
been approved, I don't see a way around it other than disabling the
checksum altogether, or having it bounce to the sender.

Thanks,
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected]
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200702011351
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFFwjbNvJuQZxSWSsgRAx5hAJ0aEyhrbqKmI+0zXffBKG6801pFVgCg7a9O
uTb8Bt9UurUBl8DB4y+Npfg=
=oz/9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: No checksums please
@ 2007-02-01 19:44  Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  parent: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2007-02-01 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www

"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[email protected]> writes:
> Could we please turn off all the checksum stuff for the mailing lists?

Are you talking about disabling the detection of duplicate messages?
That seems like a seriously bad idea.  I personally see a number of my
own messages regurgitated every so often by various people's broken
Microsloth-hatched excuses for MTAs, and I would not like to see those
dups dumped into the mailing list again (for one thing, it only takes
a small amount more MTA breakage to turn that into a self-feeding flood).

			regards, tom lane



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: No checksums please
@ 2007-02-01 22:13  Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  parent: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Greg Sabino Mullane @ 2007-02-01 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-www


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


Tom Lane asks about my proposal:
>> Could we please turn off all the checksum stuff for the mailing lists?

> Are you talking about disabling the detection of duplicate messages?
> That seems like a seriously bad idea.

Well, perhaps not turn off, but at least bounce back to the sender, not
the moderation queue. I believe that is the way it used to be, which
makes a lot more sense to me.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected]
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200702011708
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFFwmUZvJuQZxSWSsgRA8gMAJ0dsExAxt0JC19B/ntzHDADUv7IaACeNYRa
f7KJ+kFaORy+t3mEIrMRTx8=
=Sbsj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: No checksums please
@ 2007-02-01 23:39  Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
  parent: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread

From: Magnus Hagander @ 2007-02-01 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>; +Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; pgsql-www

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Greg Sabino Mullane" <[email protected]> writes:
> > Could we please turn off all the checksum stuff for the mailing lists?
> 
> Are you talking about disabling the detection of duplicate messages?
> That seems like a seriously bad idea.  I personally see a number of my
> own messages regurgitated every so often by various people's broken
> Microsloth-hatched excuses for MTAs, and I would not like to see those
> dups dumped into the mailing list again (for one thing, it only takes
> a small amount more MTA breakage to turn that into a self-feeding flood).

I don't know if there is a difference between "duplicate detection" and
"partial duplicate detection". AFAIK, only the "partial duplicate
detection" has caused problems. But just ignore that ocmment if they are
the same thing.

//Magnus



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: No checksums please
@ 2007-02-06 16:49  Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  parent: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread

From: Greg Sabino Mullane @ 2007-02-06 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-www


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> I don't know if there is a difference between "duplicate detection" and
> "partial duplicate detection". AFAIK, only the "partial duplicate
> detection" has caused problems. But just ignore that ocmment if they are
> the same thing.

Most of the moderated posts in the queue (e.g. -announce) seem to have
all three types of checksums:

Duplicate Message-ID
Duplicate Message Checksum
Duplicate Partial Message Checksum

It's fairly frustrating - for example, the recent post from Pavel Golub
was approved by me this morning, and a few minutes later there were
five separate messages in the queue with this message and all three
duplicate warnings on each of them. I've left them in there in case
others want to take a look.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected]
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200702061142
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFFyLCkvJuQZxSWSsgRA27/AKCEvJvFTvM7yaaabJHXbqjlx/SPCACfSF0L
EY1AwU6fRz435R/B2m7gG48=
=qWLn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: No checksums please
@ 2007-02-07 22:14  Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  parent: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2007-02-07 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Tuesday, February 06, 2007 16:49:28 +0000 Greg Sabino Mullane 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
>> I don't know if there is a difference between "duplicate detection" and
>> "partial duplicate detection". AFAIK, only the "partial duplicate
>> detection" has caused problems. But just ignore that ocmment if they are
>> the same thing.
>
> Most of the moderated posts in the queue (e.g. -announce) seem to have
> all three types of checksums:
>
> Duplicate Message-ID
> Duplicate Message Checksum
> Duplicate Partial Message Checksum
>
> It's fairly frustrating - for example, the recent post from Pavel Golub
> was approved by me this morning, and a few minutes later there were
> five separate messages in the queue with this message and all three
> duplicate warnings on each of them. I've left them in there in case
> others want to take a look.

I put a check on Duplicate Message-ID in place, but left the checksum stuff 
turned off ... that should reduce the duplicates in the queue, but still allow 
stuff like the posts to slave-to-the-web through ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [email protected]                              MSN . [email protected]
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFyk8t4QvfyHIvDvMRAteoAJ0bgyTfW2IJtW4eNwSMBJwOCLf6uwCgq3rz
NSlt2n4Cjeu6zpp2UcCQobo=
=ULUd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-07 22:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-01 18:55 No checksums please Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
2007-02-01 19:44 ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
2007-02-01 22:13   ` Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
2007-02-01 23:39   ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
2007-02-06 16:49     ` Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
2007-02-07 22:14       ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox