public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedTypos fixes and an accesskey
2007-04-02 23:13 UTC Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
` Re: Typos fixes and an accesskey
2007-04-04 21:44 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Typos fixes and an accesskey
2007-04-04 22:26 UTC Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
` Re: Typos fixes and an accesskey
2007-04-05 05:46 UTC Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
` Re: Typos fixes and an accesskey
2007-04-05 09:13 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
[5+ messages in thread]
RO translation of the pg web site (part 1)
2007-03-30 15:13 UTC Adrian Maier <[email protected]>
` Re: RO translation of the pg web site (part 1)
2007-04-02 08:52 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
[2+ messages in thread]
Suggestion: choosing a maximum line length in the html files
2007-04-02 08:15 UTC Adrian Maier <[email protected]>
` Re: Suggestion: choosing a maximum line length in the html files
2007-04-02 08:39 UTC Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
` Re: Suggestion: choosing a maximum line length in the html files
2007-04-02 08:47 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
[3+ messages in thread]
Help: reading the source
2007-03-30 05:20 UTC =?gb2312?B?wO7E/g==?= <[email protected]>
` Re: Help: reading the source
2007-03-30 16:34 UTC Andrew Hammond <[email protected]>
[2+ messages in thread]
Main page lacking "More" button for events
2007-03-20 23:53 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: Main page lacking "More" button for events
2007-03-27 00:54 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: Main page lacking "More" button for events
2007-03-30 05:51 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
[3+ messages in thread]
Archives digest instructions update
2007-03-05 01:57 UTC Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
` Re: Archives digest instructions update
2007-03-25 17:01 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
` Re: Archives digest instructions update
2007-03-26 13:35 UTC Dave Page <[email protected]>
[3+ messages in thread]
Search on postgresql.org doesn't work properly?
2007-03-20 14:03 UTC Nikolay Samokhvalov <[email protected]>
` Re: Search on postgresql.org doesn't work properly?
2007-03-21 09:46 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
[2+ messages in thread]
Second try for roadmap.html
2007-02-27 19:08 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-02-28 00:06 UTC Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-02-28 00:21 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-02-28 01:33 UTC Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-02-28 02:06 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-02-28 03:03 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-02-28 06:09 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-02-28 06:36 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-03-05 13:07 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-03-05 13:43 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-03-06 01:15 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-03-06 01:31 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-03-06 01:35 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-03-06 19:30 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-03-06 22:02 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-03-06 22:59 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-03-07 00:56 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Second try for roadmap.html
2007-03-20 19:30 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
[18+ messages in thread]
should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 01:19 UTC Andrew Hammond <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 01:22 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 08:53 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 14:30 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 14:47 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 15:07 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 15:42 UTC Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 16:08 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 17:52 UTC Theo Kramer <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 17:56 UTC Andrew Hammond <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 18:43 UTC bubblboy <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 18:52 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 18:54 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 19:13 UTC Andrew Hammond <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 19:46 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 19:47 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 20:01 UTC Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 20:06 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 22:39 UTC Andrew Hammond <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-21 22:54 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-22 12:35 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-22 23:41 UTC Andrew Hammond <[email protected]>
` Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-22 23:44 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-22 23:49 UTC Andrew Hammond <[email protected]>
` Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-23 08:33 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-23 19:07 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-02-25 05:06 UTC Dave Page <[email protected]>
` Re: Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-03-12 21:27 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-03-12 23:58 UTC Andrew Hammond <[email protected]>
` Re: Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-03-13 03:00 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
` Re: Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-03-13 09:01 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
2007-03-20 17:44 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
[32+ messages in thread]
Re: Remembering the last used mirror
2007-03-18 20:34 UTC Dave Page <[email protected]>
` Re: Remembering the last used mirror
2007-03-18 21:42 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Remembering the last used mirror
2007-03-19 08:51 UTC Dave Page <[email protected]>
` Re: Remembering the last used mirror
2007-03-19 09:01 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Remembering the last used mirror
2007-03-19 09:22 UTC Dave Page <[email protected]>
` Re: Remembering the last used mirror
2007-03-19 15:16 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Remembering the last used mirror
2007-03-19 15:30 UTC Dave Page <[email protected]>
` Re: Remembering the last used mirror
2007-03-19 19:49 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
[8+ messages in thread]
Remembering the last used mirror
2007-03-18 19:41 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Please remove ECPG from SoC page right away
2007-03-18 12:18 UTC Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
` Re: Please remove ECPG from SoC page right away
2007-03-18 12:59 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
[2+ messages in thread]
DNS for wwwmaster broken?
2007-03-13 21:46 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: DNS for wwwmaster broken?
2007-03-13 23:12 UTC Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
` Re: DNS for wwwmaster broken?
2007-03-13 23:20 UTC Gavin M. Roy <[email protected]>
` Re: DNS for wwwmaster broken?
2007-03-13 23:23 UTC Gavin M. Roy <[email protected]>
` Re: DNS for wwwmaster broken?
2007-03-14 14:08 UTC Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
[5+ messages in thread]
FTP link broken
2007-03-13 01:43 UTC Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
` Re: FTP link broken
2007-03-13 08:41 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
[2+ messages in thread]
Oops on pwn?
2007-03-12 15:11 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Oops on pwn?
2007-03-12 16:37 UTC David Fetter <[email protected]>
[2+ messages in thread]
New website code in
2007-03-12 15:35 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Updated summerofcode pages
2007-03-09 22:51 UTC Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
Old SoC page
2007-02-27 09:15 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Old SoC page
2007-02-27 15:35 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
` Re: Old SoC page
2007-02-27 16:47 UTC Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
` Re: Old SoC page
2007-03-04 10:13 UTC Nikolay Samokhvalov <[email protected]>
` Re: Old SoC page
2007-03-05 17:36 UTC Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
` Re: Old SoC page
2007-03-05 18:53 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
[6+ messages in thread]
update to main page for feature freeze
2007-02-27 00:48 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: update to main page for feature freeze
2007-02-27 17:13 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
` Re: update to main page for feature freeze
2007-02-27 17:26 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: update to main page for feature freeze
2007-02-27 17:55 UTC Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
` Re: update to main page for feature freeze
2007-02-27 18:00 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: update to main page for feature freeze
2007-02-27 20:06 UTC Dave Page <[email protected]>
` Re: update to main page for feature freeze
2007-02-27 22:35 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: update to main page for feature freeze
2007-02-27 22:44 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: update to main page for feature freeze
2007-02-27 22:44 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: update to main page for feature freeze
2007-02-27 22:51 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: update to main page for feature freeze
2007-03-05 13:12 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: update to main page for feature freeze
2007-03-05 18:04 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
[12+ messages in thread]
"here" links
2007-02-05 12:18 UTC Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
` Re: "here" links
2007-02-19 21:48 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: "here" links
2007-02-19 22:18 UTC Dave Page <[email protected]>
` Re: "here" links
2007-02-19 22:18 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: "here" links
2007-02-19 22:24 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: "here" links
2007-02-20 06:11 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
[6+ messages in thread]
Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-11 13:22 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-11 16:45 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-11 17:11 UTC Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-11 18:26 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-11 20:55 UTC Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-11 21:19 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-11 21:22 UTC Adrian Maier <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-11 21:46 UTC Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 00:33 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 03:32 UTC Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 03:42 UTC Robert Treat <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 04:28 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 05:11 UTC Jaime Casanova <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 08:16 UTC Adrian Maier <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 08:45 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 08:50 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 09:16 UTC Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 09:18 UTC Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 09:36 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 09:37 UTC Adrian Maier <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 09:49 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 09:50 UTC Dave Page <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 10:51 UTC Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 11:34 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 11:38 UTC Adrian Maier <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 12:28 UTC Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 12:34 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 13:10 UTC Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 13:18 UTC Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 13:32 UTC Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 15:39 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 20:10 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 21:39 UTC Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 22:00 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 22:04 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-12 22:40 UTC Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-13 00:24 UTC Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-13 00:48 UTC Jaime Casanova <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-13 06:03 UTC Tino Wildenhain <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-13 18:20 UTC Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-13 19:18 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-13 20:41 UTC Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-13 22:44 UTC Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-13 22:46 UTC Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-14 02:13 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-14 04:50 UTC Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-14 08:23 UTC Dave Page <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-14 08:36 UTC Dave Page <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-14 08:39 UTC Adrian Maier <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-15 14:03 UTC Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-18 11:34 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Multi-language to be or not to be
2007-02-18 11:38 UTC Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
[52+ messages in thread]
Default search sites
2007-02-09 19:31 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: Default search sites
2007-02-09 20:34 UTC Tom Lane <[email protected]>
` Re: Default search sites
2007-02-10 20:32 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
[3+ messages in thread]
Re: lost outside pgfoundry: where is the door?
2007-02-09 17:25 UTC joe speigle <[email protected]>
doxygen.postgresql.org
2007-02-06 17:19 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: [HACKERS] doxygen.postgresql.org
2007-02-07 00:53 UTC Luke Lonergan <[email protected]>
` Re: [HACKERS] doxygen.postgresql.org
2007-02-07 04:58 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: [HACKERS] doxygen.postgresql.org
2007-02-09 05:38 UTC Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
[4+ messages in thread]
email is fast!
2007-02-02 05:46 UTC Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
` Re: email is fast!
2007-02-02 08:21 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: email is fast!
2007-02-06 22:13 UTC Kevin Hunter <[email protected]>
` Re: email is fast!
2007-02-06 22:50 UTC Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
` Re: email is fast!
2007-02-07 01:28 UTC Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
` Re: email is fast!
2007-02-07 22:16 UTC Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
` Re: email is fast!
2007-02-07 22:17 UTC Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
` Re: email is fast!
2007-02-07 22:21 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: email is fast!
2007-02-07 23:01 UTC Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
` Re: email is fast!
2007-02-08 08:29 UTC Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
` Re: email is fast!
2007-02-08 16:40 UTC Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
[11+ messages in thread]
[next (older)]
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox