public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Federico Di Gregorio <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:44:53 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+mi_8Y5L-gnio+RUs6XtfOqEbOAiyVS8y9XqYSkfLB8dnPd8w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+mi_8Y5L-gnio+RUs6XtfOqEbOAiyVS8y9XqYSkfLB8dnPd8w@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/11/20 18:12, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have received some concerned voices in regard to have a package called 
> "psycopg3". I guess many have been burned out by the Python 2 to 3 
> transition, and now it's not a happy pair of number to see next to each 
> other. Sorry, Fibonacci...
> 
> The rationale behind having the 2 in the package name was to allow the 
> coexistence between v1 and 2. But now that nobody uses v1 anymore, I 
> think the name can be considered free. I believe it even predates pypi 
> and the requirements.txt convention. Dark times...
> 
> Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as 
> version number?

Seems fine to me.

federico

view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox