public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Patrick Starrenburg <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:53:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+6L-Z8CzK=42PQTeGda7WCS2fXHA1_Cnrr-XQYygKfnBGzacA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+mi_8Y5L-gnio+RUs6XtfOqEbOAiyVS8y9XqYSkfLB8dnPd8w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+mi_8Y5L-gnio+RUs6XtfOqEbOAiyVS8y9XqYSkfLB8dnPd8w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi

I think the straight package name "psycopg" would be good.

PS

On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 15:46, Daniele Varrazzo <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have received some concerned voices in regard to have a package called
> "psycopg3". I guess many have been burned out by the Python 2 to 3
> transition, and now it's not a happy pair of number to see next to each
> other. Sorry, Fibonacci...
>
> The rationale behind having the 2 in the package name was to allow the
> coexistence between v1 and 2. But now that nobody uses v1 anymore, I think
> the name can be considered free. I believe it even predates pypi and the
> requirements.txt convention. Dark times...
>
> Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
> version number?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Daniele
>

view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
  In-Reply-To: <CA+6L-Z8CzK=42PQTeGda7WCS2fXHA1_Cnrr-XQYygKfnBGzacA@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox