pg.ddx.io  pgsql-committers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Rework option set of vacuumlo
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 17:47:47 -0400
Message-ID: <7228.1535492867@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180828213701.GL29157@paquier.xyz>
References: <E1fudM8-0000af-Lm@gemulon.postgresql.org>
	<12438.1535488750@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<17758.1535490505@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20180828213701.GL29157@paquier.xyz>

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:08:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh!  The reason why not is that that line is inside "ifdef REGRESS",
>> and these subdirectories have no REGRESS tests.  So we should move
>> that out to where it will apply regardless of that.  Will fix.

> Yes, I was going to send a patch along the same lines as what you have
> just committed.  Thanks!  It looks that the binary was installed in my
> own PATH, so I did not notice it.

> This should definitely get back-patched in my opinion, I have similar
> problems with pg_rewind tests of 9.3 and 9.4 that I still maintain out
> of the core tree, where the main binary needs to be installed first.  In
> this case I just used some Makefile trick.

I didn't want to backpatch further than v11 without a test case that would
work in those branches, and I lacked one.  If you've got out-of-core code
you could verify it with, please do that and back-patch further.

			regards, tom lane




view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <7228.1535492867@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../7228.1535492867@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/7228.1535492867@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, michael@paquier.xyz, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: pgsql: Rework option set of vacuumlo
  In-Reply-To: <7228.1535492867@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox