pg.ddx.io pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedObsolete references to GBorg in documentation
6+ messages / 4 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
@ 2007-11-14 02:02 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2007-11-14 03:17 ` Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
2007-11-14 03:40 ` Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
2007-11-14 05:41 ` Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
2007-11-14 14:08 ` Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Lane @ 2007-11-14 02:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>; +Cc: pgsql-docs
Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.
There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
2007-11-14 02:02 Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
@ 2007-11-14 03:17 ` Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
2007-11-14 03:28 ` Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joshua D. Drake @ 2007-11-14 03:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>; pgsql-docs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:02:06 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
> good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.
>
> There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
> which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
> correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
> Thoughts?
There are some references in the main docs too last I checked. I can
submit a patch in the next day.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your
> friend
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHOmiwATb/zqfZUUQRApuMAKCdPuaEHNgpxeMPtunkjfTP5h0x7ACgpGoe
z4N2DouGfeDDbNQ8LMsAxKw=
=zUqf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
2007-11-14 02:02 Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2007-11-14 03:17 ` Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
@ 2007-11-14 03:28 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Lane @ 2007-11-14 03:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>; +Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>; pgsql-docs
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
>> good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.
>>
>> There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
>> which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
>> correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
>> Thoughts?
> There are some references in the main docs too last I checked. I can
> submit a patch in the next day.
I think I already got everything except the items mentioned above.
regards, tom lane
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
2007-11-14 02:02 Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
@ 2007-11-14 03:40 ` Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Momjian @ 2007-11-14 03:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-docs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
> good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.
I have updated the FAQ and FAQ_DEV.
> There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
> which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
> correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
> Thoughts?
Uh, if we can update them I think we should.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
2007-11-14 02:02 Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
@ 2007-11-14 05:41 ` Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2007-11-14 05:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs; +Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
> There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
> which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
> correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
Maybe add something like " ... [later moved to http://...pgfoundry.../]"
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
2007-11-14 02:02 Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
@ 2007-11-14 14:08 ` Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Momjian @ 2007-11-14 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-docs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
> good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.
>
> There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
> which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
> correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
> Thoughts?
I looked at the release note mention of gborg and they are generic URLs
meaning they don't point to specific projects, I think we should just
leave them alone (as Marc suggested).
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-14 14:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-14 02:02 Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2007-11-14 03:17 ` Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
2007-11-14 03:28 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2007-11-14 03:40 ` Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
2007-11-14 05:41 ` Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
2007-11-14 14:08 ` Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox