public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Array functions not mentioned in Index 8+ messages / 4 participants [nested] [flat]
* Array functions not mentioned in Index @ 2009-03-29 15:12 Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Mario Splivalo @ 2009-03-29 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-docs None of the array functions (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. Mike ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index @ 2009-03-30 15:47 Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> parent: Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Alvaro Herrera @ 2009-03-30 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs Mario Splivalo wrote: > None of the array functions > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) > are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? > I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. Agreed -- please submit a patch. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index @ 2009-03-31 11:09 Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> parent: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Mario Splivalo @ 2009-03-31 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Mario Splivalo wrote: >> None of the array functions >> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) >> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? >> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. > > Agreed -- please submit a patch. > Sure thing. It will take some time to get along with Docbook, indexing and everything. Mike ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index @ 2009-04-01 01:57 Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> parent: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Mario Splivalo @ 2009-04-01 01:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Mario Splivalo wrote: >> None of the array functions >> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) >> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? >> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. > > Agreed -- please submit a patch. Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation? Mario Attachments: [text/x-diff] func.sgml.patch (1.4K, 2-func.sgml.patch) download | inline diff: ? func.sgml.patch Index: doc/src/sgml/func.sgml =================================================================== RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.473 diff -c -r1.473 func.sgml *** doc/src/sgml/func.sgml 23 Mar 2009 21:00:38 -0000 1.473 --- doc/src/sgml/func.sgml 1 Apr 2009 01:48:14 -0000 *************** *** 9338,9343 **** --- 9338,9380 ---- for more discussion and examples of the use of these functions. </para> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_append</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_cat</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_ndims</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_dims</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_fill</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_length</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_lower</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_prepend</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_to_string</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_upper</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>string_to_array</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>cardinality</primary> + </indexterm> + <table id="array-functions-table"> <title>Array Functions</title> <tgroup cols="5"> ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index @ 2009-04-01 03:33 Tom Lane <[email protected]> parent: Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Tom Lane @ 2009-04-01 03:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>; +Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> writes: > Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation? I think you just did. Applied, thanks. regards, tom lane PS: why'd you omit unnest()? ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index @ 2009-04-01 16:27 Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> parent: Tom Lane <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Mario Splivalo @ 2009-04-01 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>; +Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs Tom Lane wrote: > Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> writes: >> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation? > > I think you just did. Applied, thanks. I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4 documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3). > PS: why'd you omit unnest()? I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry. Mike ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index @ 2009-04-09 21:59 Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> parent: Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Bruce Momjian @ 2009-04-09 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>; +Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>; Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs Mario Splivalo wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> writes: > >> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation? > > > > I think you just did. Applied, thanks. > > I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4 > documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3). > > > PS: why'd you omit unnest()? > > I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry. Did unnest() get added properly too? -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index @ 2009-04-09 22:23 Tom Lane <[email protected]> parent: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Tom Lane @ 2009-04-09 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>; +Cc: Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>; Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > Did unnest() get added properly too? Yes, I included it in the patch. regards, tom lane ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-09 22:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-03-29 15:12 Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> 2009-03-30 15:47 ` Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> 2009-03-31 11:09 ` Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> 2009-04-01 01:57 ` Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> 2009-04-01 03:33 ` Tom Lane <[email protected]> 2009-04-01 16:27 ` Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> 2009-04-09 21:59 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> 2009-04-09 22:23 ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox