public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Array functions not mentioned in Index
8+ messages / 4 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Array functions not mentioned in Index
@ 2009-03-29 15:12 Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-03-30 15:47 ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread

From: Mario Splivalo @ 2009-03-29 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs

None of the array functions
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.

	Mike



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
  2009-03-29 15:12 Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
@ 2009-03-30 15:47 ` Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
  2009-03-31 11:09   ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 01:57   ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread

From: Alvaro Herrera @ 2009-03-30 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

Mario Splivalo wrote:
> None of the array functions
> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.

Agreed -- please submit a patch.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
  2009-03-29 15:12 Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-03-30 15:47 ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
@ 2009-03-31 11:09   ` Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread

From: Mario Splivalo @ 2009-03-31 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Mario Splivalo wrote:
>> None of the array functions
>> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
>> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
>> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.
> 
> Agreed -- please submit a patch.
> 

Sure thing. It will take some time to get along with Docbook, indexing 
and everything.

	Mike



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
  2009-03-29 15:12 Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-03-30 15:47 ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
@ 2009-04-01 01:57   ` Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 03:33     ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread

From: Mario Splivalo @ 2009-04-01 01:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Mario Splivalo wrote:
>> None of the array functions
>> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
>> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
>> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.
> 
> Agreed -- please submit a patch.

Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?

	Mario


Attachments:

  [text/x-diff] func.sgml.patch (1.4K, 2-func.sgml.patch)
  download | inline diff:
? func.sgml.patch
Index: doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.473
diff -c -r1.473 func.sgml
*** doc/src/sgml/func.sgml	23 Mar 2009 21:00:38 -0000	1.473
--- doc/src/sgml/func.sgml	1 Apr 2009 01:48:14 -0000
***************
*** 9338,9343 ****
--- 9338,9380 ----
     for more discussion and examples of the use of these functions.
    </para>
  
+   <indexterm>
+     <primary>array_append</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+   <indexterm>
+     <primary>array_cat</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+   <indexterm>
+     <primary>array_ndims</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+   <indexterm>
+     <primary>array_dims</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+   <indexterm>
+     <primary>array_fill</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+   <indexterm>
+     <primary>array_length</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+   <indexterm>
+     <primary>array_lower</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+   <indexterm>
+     <primary>array_prepend</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+   <indexterm>
+     <primary>array_to_string</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+  <indexterm>
+     <primary>array_upper</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+   <indexterm>
+     <primary>string_to_array</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+   <indexterm>
+     <primary>cardinality</primary>
+   </indexterm>	
+ 
      <table id="array-functions-table">
       <title>Array Functions</title>
       <tgroup cols="5">


^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
  2009-03-29 15:12 Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-03-30 15:47 ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 01:57   ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
@ 2009-04-01 03:33     ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 16:27       ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2009-04-01 03:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>; +Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs

Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> writes:
> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?

I think you just did.  Applied, thanks.

			regards, tom lane

PS: why'd you omit unnest()?



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
  2009-03-29 15:12 Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-03-30 15:47 ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 01:57   ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 03:33     ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Tom Lane <[email protected]>
@ 2009-04-01 16:27       ` Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-04-09 21:59         ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread

From: Mario Splivalo @ 2009-04-01 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>; +Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs

Tom Lane wrote:
> Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> writes:
>> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?
> 
> I think you just did.  Applied, thanks.

I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4 
documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3).

> PS: why'd you omit unnest()?

I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry.

	Mike




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
  2009-03-29 15:12 Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-03-30 15:47 ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 01:57   ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 03:33     ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 16:27       ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
@ 2009-04-09 21:59         ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  2009-04-09 22:23           ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2009-04-09 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>; +Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>; Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs

Mario Splivalo wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Mario Splivalo <[email protected]> writes:
> >> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?
> > 
> > I think you just did.  Applied, thanks.
> 
> I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4 
> documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3).
> 
> > PS: why'd you omit unnest()?
> 
> I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry.

Did unnest() get added properly too?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
  2009-03-29 15:12 Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-03-30 15:47 ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 01:57   ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 03:33     ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  2009-04-01 16:27       ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
  2009-04-09 21:59         ` Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
@ 2009-04-09 22:23           ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2009-04-09 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>; +Cc: Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>; Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> Did unnest() get added properly too?

Yes, I included it in the patch.

			regards, tom lane




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 8+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-09 22:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-29 15:12 Array functions not mentioned in Index Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
2009-03-30 15:47 ` Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
2009-03-31 11:09   ` Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
2009-04-01 01:57   ` Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
2009-04-01 03:33     ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
2009-04-01 16:27       ` Mario Splivalo <[email protected]>
2009-04-09 21:59         ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2009-04-09 22:23           ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox