From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: The order of columns about WAL activity in pg_stat_statements
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 11:41:41 -0400
Message-ID: <2961.1589384501@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6e68c83-0923-afe7-c1f2-5c5843a21687@oss.nttdata.com>
References: <a6e68c83-0923-afe7-c1f2-5c5843a21687@oss.nttdata.com>
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
> In pg_stat_statements docs, the columns about WAL activity are put
> in the table in the order of wal_bytes, wal_records and wal_fpi. But
> in the definition of pg_stat_statements view, wal_bytes is put last.
> So I think that it's better to reorder those columns in a consistent
> with the view definition. Patch attached. Thought?
I already fixed this in my pending patch to restructure the catalog
docs [1].
regards, tom lane
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/14810.1589128043%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com
Subject: Re: The order of columns about WAL activity in pg_stat_statements
In-Reply-To: <2961.1589384501@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox