From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: The order of columns about WAL activity in pg_stat_statements
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 01:12:21 +0900
Message-ID: <6a2cca46-d3c0-265a-9c63-7814e4b3549b@oss.nttdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2961.1589384501@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <a6e68c83-0923-afe7-c1f2-5c5843a21687@oss.nttdata.com>
<2961.1589384501@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2020/05/14 0:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
>> In pg_stat_statements docs, the columns about WAL activity are put
>> in the table in the order of wal_bytes, wal_records and wal_fpi. But
>> in the definition of pg_stat_statements view, wal_bytes is put last.
>> So I think that it's better to reorder those columns in a consistent
>> with the view definition. Patch attached. Thought?
>
> I already fixed this in my pending patch to restructure the catalog
> docs [1].
Sounds nice. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: The order of columns about WAL activity in pg_stat_statements
In-Reply-To: <6a2cca46-d3c0-265a-9c63-7814e4b3549b@oss.nttdata.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox