From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:25:39 -0700
Message-ID: <47068FB3.8060701@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071005192152.GF6005@fetter.org>
References: <200710051922.01797.peter_e@gmx.net>
<20071005182650.GD6005@fetter.org>
<470685E1.6010501@commandprompt.com>
<20071005190718.GE6005@fetter.org>
<47068DD4.4080505@commandprompt.com>
<20071005192152.GF6005@fetter.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:17:40PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>> So I think what is being proposed is wrong and needs to be
>>>>>> reverted.
>>>>> That, or (my preference) make the change larger. I think it's
>>>>> significant that the vast majority of compatible software has some
>>>>> variant of Postgres and *not* PostgreSQL in the name.
>>>> I have seen no evidence of this.
>>> For evidence, take a look at the "Products" section of the Postgres
>>> Weekly News.
>> I just read through all products sections in the PostgreSQL weekly news
>> from 07-22-07 to 09-30-07.
>
> Nice job of careful cherry-picking, but I'm not buying it.
It is your news David, written in black and white. Feel free to review
them yourself and post a counter. I would be interested in anything I
missed.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> D
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHBo+zATb/zqfZUUQRAt9yAKCKMJGWII3WkFzhBINqRsRs0jrnkgCfc8dE
POi/0pATD1IhTYVFdqlCbdo=
=xL1Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, david@fetter.org, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency
In-Reply-To: <47068FB3.8060701@commandprompt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox