public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
To: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Shinya Kato <[email protected]>
Cc: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Cc: Postgres hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 15:04:45 -0500
Message-ID: <aEH4XYwrlyvjZUvE@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <Zur4qqhABOXtZS8h@nathan>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CAOzEurQZ1a+6d1K8b=+Ww1NFQVwAt9KSCQsBWXYBaPnYCenK3g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOzEurRRfPaZn_ZGmoDz2C3+74SAhk+FUZo_9oB1Zg_rQNGkYA@mail.gmail.com>
<aEBxIcAiiDVlQvdx@nathan>
<[email protected]>
<CAOzEurS=3xu8WV6KRmc-axLn5tUs_5Ggy0DY_Gj8XcFOJTDeWQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 01:57:30PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> How does the RMT feel about this change? Nathan, would you be OK with
> that? It's not a big problem, as well, if the code is kept as-is, but
> as it's a simple change..
IMHO a case can be reasonably made that this is an oversight in the related
commit. I've added the rest of the RMT here in case they see it
differently.
The patch LGTM, too.
--
nathan
view thread (20+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
In-Reply-To: <aEH4XYwrlyvjZUvE@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox