pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:16:44 +0100
Message-ID: <bcf45c82-16b4-16a0-91cc-001c03c03ce3@postgresfriends.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560f1eb3-5b43-eade-1c87-15c7d83130a8@postgresfriends.org>
References: <e04078e8-ae4a-b09d-896d-5f2f5a042248@2ndquadrant.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.21.2001271250190.24374@pseudo>
	<13bc9081-2cf8-bf99-bedb-ce70c82bebc8@2ndquadrant.com>
	<20200203070807.GD2180@paquier.xyz>
	<5E008326-2335-4FB2-8513-D9018EC94F02@yesql.se>
	<6749.1580740801@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<79ac1ca0-2bab-bbe4-126a-01966f812075@2ndquadrant.com>
	<20200204082036.GA94169@paquier.xyz>
	<CA+TgmoZp=wwSJ+f54G69ACXL77MRCO8j9OZhQo1NsaQ01=1cFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<3389.1580916071@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20200206023820.GF23913@paquier.xyz>
	<560f1eb3-5b43-eade-1c87-15c7d83130a8@postgresfriends.org>

On 06/02/2020 03:56, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 06/02/2020 03:38, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:21:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
>>>> way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
>>>> If we've actually got a broad consensus on it, sure, but I don't think
>>>> 4 votes is a broad consensus.
>>>
>>> Fair point.  I'm still abstaining, but maybe this should be proposed
>>> on pgsql-general to try to get more opinions?
>>
>> Indeed, still I am not sure what kind of number is enough to define a
>> large consensus.  Vik, could you start a new thread on -general?
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3d8e809b-fc26-87c5-55ac-616a98d2b0be%40postgresfriends.or...

The vote here was 6 yeas and 1 nay (85.7%) with 2 abstentions.

The poll on pgsql-general has gone stale with 19 yeas and 2 nays (90.5%).

My poll on Twitter has ended with 33 yeas and 4 nays (89.2%).
https://twitter.com/pg_xocolatl/status/1225258876527874048

There is a little bit of overlap within those three groups but among the
minuscule percentage of our users that responded, the result is
overwhelmingly in favor of this change.
-- 
Vik Fearing





view thread (23+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <bcf45c82-16b4-16a0-91cc-001c03c03ce3@postgresfriends.org>
Permalink:  ../bcf45c82-16b4-16a0-91cc-001c03c03ce3@postgresfriends.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/bcf45c82-16b4-16a0-91cc-001c03c03ce3@postgresfriends.org

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: vik@postgresfriends.org, michael@paquier.xyz, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com, daniel@yesql.se, coelho@cri.ensmp.fr
  Subject: Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2
  In-Reply-To: <bcf45c82-16b4-16a0-91cc-001c03c03ce3@postgresfriends.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox