pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Pitts <justinpitts@gmail.com>
To: Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
Cc: Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL - Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Testing FusionIO
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:52:26 -0400
Message-ID: <82964EE9-2507-4DB0-83A9-30DCCBBAE274@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268831900.4412.1739.camel@bnicholson-desktop>
References: <1268059301.2098.87.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org>
	<0A41C50D-3F29-4021-A959-95AF955D570F@silentmedia.com>
	<1268829058.2137.31.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org>
	<1268831008.4412.1736.camel@bnicholson-desktop>
	<86675EB2-8CC8-4159-91DD-27BB5E6AC1C3@gmail.com>
	<1268831900.4412.1739.camel@bnicholson-desktop>

FusionIO is publicly claiming 24 years @ 5TB/day on the 80GB SLC device, which wear levels across 100GB of actual installed capacity. 

http://community.fusionio.com/forums/p/34/258.aspx#258

Max drive performance would be about 41TB/day, which coincidently works out very close to the 3 year warranty they have on the devices.

FusionIO's claim _seems_ credible. I'd love to see some evidence to the contrary.


On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Brad Nicholson wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:11 -0400, Justin Pitts wrote:
>> On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Brad Nicholson wrote:
>> 
>>> I've been hearing bad things from some folks about the quality of the
>>> FusionIO drives from a durability standpoint.
>> 
>> Can you be more specific about that? Durability over what time frame? How many devices in the sample set? How did FusionIO deal with the issue?
> 
> I didn't get any specifics - as we are looking at other products.  It
> did center around how FusionIO did wear-leveling though. 
> -- 
> Brad Nicholson  416-673-4106
> Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
> 
> 




view thread (17+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <82964EE9-2507-4DB0-83A9-30DCCBBAE274@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../82964EE9-2507-4DB0-83A9-30DCCBBAE274@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/82964EE9-2507-4DB0-83A9-30DCCBBAE274@gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: justinpitts@gmail.com, bnichols@ca.afilias.info, devrim@gunduz.org, bench@silentmedia.com
  Subject: Re: Testing FusionIO
  In-Reply-To: <82964EE9-2507-4DB0-83A9-30DCCBBAE274@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox