From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Gary Chambers <gwchamb@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 8.4.1 distinct query WITHOUT order by
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:18:11 -0700
Message-ID: <dcc563d10912212118w2e78a715k49dc0a8fcecd63dd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <302670f20912211945n1b6684e9xb304d4508766f117@mail.gmail.com>
References: <302670f20912211415n4fc73b04x19eebfb9ff0acd60@mail.gmail.com>
<hgotd1$mei$1@ger.gmane.org>
<dcc563d10912211453ybe3b4d6y87303e795e3115c1@mail.gmail.com>
<302670f20912211945n1b6684e9xb304d4508766f117@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Gary Chambers <gwchamb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, if you're code base is that fragile, bandaging it up by jumping
>> through hoops in pgsql is just putting off the inevitable when it (the
>> code base) has to get recompiled someday anyway.
>
> I appreciate (and agree with) the concern about the fragility of the
> codebase. The maintainer knows that anything except adding ORDER BY
> is a kludge.
>
> Now, the aforementioned notwithstanding...
Replacing the table with a view should work. Just be sure to make
insert rules if you need it to be insertable by other parts of the app
I guess.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: scott.marlowe@gmail.com, gwchamb@gmail.com, spam_eater@gmx.net
Subject: Re: 8.4.1 distinct query WITHOUT order by
In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10912212118w2e78a715k49dc0a8fcecd63dd@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox