pg.ddx.io  pgsql-committers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Rework option set of vacuumlo
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:32:15 -0700
Message-ID: <20180830013215.GG5903@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7228.1535492867@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <E1fudM8-0000af-Lm@gemulon.postgresql.org>
	<12438.1535488750@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<17758.1535490505@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20180828213701.GL29157@paquier.xyz>
	<7228.1535492867@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:47:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I didn't want to backpatch further than v11 without a test case that would
> work in those branches, and I lacked one.  If you've got out-of-core code
> you could verify it with, please do that and back-patch further.

Was there any need to patch v11 with that actually?  As there is nothing
which needs except HEAD that does not seem strictly necessary.

I have reviewed the modules I have, and actually it seems that I would
not need much of that for a back-patch.  One reason being that most of
my TAP tests need pg_regress so as nodes can be initialized so this
needs an external installation anyway.  Maybe others have more thoughts
to offer and would prefer a back-patch.
--
Michael

Attachments:

  [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (832B, ../20180830013215.GG5903@paquier.xyz/2-signature.asc)
  download

view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20180830013215.GG5903@paquier.xyz>
Permalink:  ../20180830013215.GG5903@paquier.xyz/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20180830013215.GG5903@paquier.xyz

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
  Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: pgsql: Rework option set of vacuumlo
  In-Reply-To: <20180830013215.GG5903@paquier.xyz>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox