pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: elionescu@yahoo.com <elionescu@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: incorrect (incomplete) description for "alter domain"
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:22:30 +0200
Message-ID: <beafea49-f28d-4953-90fe-bf759161ef9d@eisentraut.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2596729.1722266261@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <172225092461.915373.6103973717483380183@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
	<CAKFQuwbZ3KDq3CtG0qtw7gVT4EWgmD8XFMktEFcruVs98ihCSw@mail.gmail.com>
	<2585954.1722265086@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<2596729.1722266261@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On 29.07.24 17:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> I think the page is technically correct, but I'm inclined to duplicate
>> this text from the CREATE DOMAIN page:
> 
>> 	where domain_constraint is:
>> 	[ CONSTRAINT constraint_name ]
>> 	{ NOT NULL | NULL | CHECK (expression) }
> 
>> rather than making readers go look that up.
> 
> Actually, there *is* a bug in the description, because experimentation
> shows that CREATE DOMAIN accepts NULL in this syntax (as advertised)
> but ALTER DOMAIN does not.  We could alternatively decide that that's
> a code bug and make ALTER DOMAIN take it, but I don't think it's worth
> any effort (and this behavior may actually have been intentional, too).
> I think we should just add
> 
> 	where domain_constraint is:
> 
> 	[ CONSTRAINT constraint_name ]
> 	{ NOT NULL | CHECK (expression) }
> 
> to the ALTER DOMAIN page, and then remove the claim that it's
> identical to CREATE DOMAIN.

There was some discussion about these issues (ALTER DOMAIN vs CREATE 
DOMAIN reference page, as well as the NOT NULL constraint syntax) in and 
around 
<https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/a4a344ea-9e79-4c42-a9af-899f85bd753b@eisentraut.org;. 
  All that ended up dying because the NOT NULL constraints feature was 
reverted.  But there were some subtle details about why the syntax is 
the way it is and/or whether that's really intentional and how to 
document it.  Might be worth reviewing again.






view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <beafea49-f28d-4953-90fe-bf759161ef9d@eisentraut.org>
Permalink:  ../beafea49-f28d-4953-90fe-bf759161ef9d@eisentraut.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/beafea49-f28d-4953-90fe-bf759161ef9d@eisentraut.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: peter@eisentraut.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, david.g.johnston@gmail.com, elionescu@yahoo.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: incorrect (incomplete) description for "alter domain"
  In-Reply-To: <beafea49-f28d-4953-90fe-bf759161ef9d@eisentraut.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox