pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed[doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-15 16:43 UTC Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch>
` Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-15 17:44 UTC Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
` Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-16 07:41 UTC Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch>
` Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-16 15:48 UTC Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
` Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-16 16:00 UTC Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch>
` Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-16 16:09 UTC Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
` Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-16 16:17 UTC Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
` Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-16 16:20 UTC Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
` Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-16 19:34 UTC Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
` Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-16 21:17 UTC Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
` Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-16 21:25 UTC Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
` Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-16 21:30 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: [PERFORM] [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal
2007-05-30 19:45 UTC Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
[13+ messages in thread]
Very slow left outer join
2007-05-30 00:16 UTC Tyrrill, Ed <tyrrill_ed@emc.com>
` Re: Very slow left outer join
2007-05-30 01:38 UTC Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>
` Re: Very slow left outer join
2007-05-30 01:54 UTC Klint Gore <kg@kgb.une.edu.au>
` Re: Very slow left outer join
2007-05-30 03:18 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Very slow left outer join
2007-05-30 16:22 UTC Tyrrill, Ed <tyrrill_ed@emc.com>
` Re: Very slow left outer join
2007-05-30 16:55 UTC Tyrrill, Ed <tyrrill_ed@emc.com>
` Re: Very slow left outer join
2007-05-30 16:59 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
[7+ messages in thread]
How PostgreSQL handles multiple DDBB instances?
2007-05-25 08:52 UTC Arnau <arnaulist@andromeiberica.com>
` Re: How PostgreSQL handles multiple DDBB instances?
2007-05-25 14:24 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: How PostgreSQL handles multiple DDBB instances?
2007-05-25 17:16 UTC Arnau <arnaulist@andromeiberica.com>
` Re: How PostgreSQL handles multiple DDBB instances?
2007-05-25 18:04 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: How PostgreSQL handles multiple DDBB instances?
2007-05-25 18:16 UTC Arnau <arnaulist@andromeiberica.com>
` Re: How PostgreSQL handles multiple DDBB instances?
2007-05-25 18:34 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: How PostgreSQL handles multiple DDBB instances?
2007-05-29 22:07 UTC Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
` Re: How PostgreSQL handles multiple DDBB instances?
2007-05-30 01:33 UTC Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
[8+ messages in thread]
Big problem with sql update operation
2007-05-25 08:57 UTC Michal Szymanski <szymanskim@datera.pl>
` Re: Big problem with sql update operation
2007-05-25 14:28 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Big problem with sql update operation
2007-05-25 22:27 UTC Michal Szymanski <szymanskim@datera.pl>
` Re: Big problem with sql update operation
2007-05-25 22:38 UTC Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
` Re: Big problem with sql update operation
2007-05-29 20:41 UTC Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
[5+ messages in thread]
general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 08:50 UTC Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 10:31 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 13:03 UTC Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 13:23 UTC Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 13:44 UTC Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 13:52 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 14:02 UTC Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 14:07 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 14:09 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 14:10 UTC Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 15:06 UTC Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 15:20 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 15:45 UTC Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 16:16 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 16:34 UTC Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 18:57 UTC Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-25 22:24 UTC Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-26 00:19 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-26 07:07 UTC Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-26 16:46 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-28 21:08 UTC Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
` Re: general PG network slowness (possible cure) (repost)
2007-05-29 13:19 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
[22+ messages in thread]
PITR performance costs
2007-05-28 12:45 UTC Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
` Re: PITR performance costs
2007-05-28 12:53 UTC Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
` Re: PITR performance costs
2007-05-28 12:54 UTC A. Kretschmer <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>
` Re: PITR performance costs
2007-05-28 16:31 UTC Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
` Re: PITR performance costs
2007-05-28 18:48 UTC Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
` Re: PITR performance costs
2007-05-28 19:46 UTC Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
` Re: PITR performance costs
2007-05-28 20:40 UTC Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
` Re: PITR performance costs
2007-05-29 13:06 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
[8+ messages in thread]
Feature suggestion : FAST CLUSTER
2007-05-22 07:29 UTC PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
` Re: Feature suggestion : FAST CLUSTER
2007-05-27 15:53 UTC Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
` Re: Feature suggestion : FAST CLUSTER
2007-05-27 17:34 UTC PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
` Re: Feature suggestion : FAST CLUSTER
2007-05-27 18:27 UTC Alexander Staubo <alex@purefiction.net>
` Re: Feature suggestion : FAST CLUSTER
2007-05-27 18:44 UTC PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
` Re: Feature suggestion : FAST CLUSTER
2007-05-29 00:48 UTC Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
` Re: Feature suggestion : FAST CLUSTER
2007-05-29 06:23 UTC PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
` Re: Feature suggestion : FAST CLUSTER
2007-05-29 08:43 UTC PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
[8+ messages in thread]
Domains versus Check Constraints
2007-05-22 16:56 UTC Chander Ganesan <chander@otg-nc.com>
` Re: Domains versus Check Constraints
2007-05-27 15:59 UTC Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
` Re: Domains versus Check Constraints
2007-05-27 16:34 UTC Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
[3+ messages in thread]
Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
2007-05-25 08:29 UTC Bastian Voigt <post@bastian-voigt.de>
` Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
2007-05-25 10:33 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
2007-05-25 10:48 UTC Bastian Voigt <post@bastian-voigt.de>
` Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
2007-05-25 11:00 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
2007-05-25 11:10 UTC Bastian Voigt <post@bastian-voigt.de>
` Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
2007-05-25 11:51 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
2007-05-25 14:18 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13)
2007-05-27 16:08 UTC Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
[8+ messages in thread]
Memory allocation and Vacuum abends
2007-05-24 02:01 UTC Leandro Guimarães dos Santos <lgsantos@contax.com.br>
` Re: Memory allocation and Vacuum abends
2007-05-27 16:06 UTC Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
[2+ messages in thread]
Simulate database fragmentation
2007-05-23 18:58 UTC Y Sidhu <ysidhu@gmail.com>
` Re: Simulate database fragmentation
2007-05-27 16:05 UTC Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
[2+ messages in thread]
ECC RAM really needed?
2007-05-26 01:45 UTC Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
` Re: ECC RAM really needed?
2007-05-26 02:15 UTC Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
` Re: ECC RAM really needed?
2007-05-26 04:01 UTC Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: ECC RAM really needed?
2007-05-26 04:19 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: ECC RAM really needed?
2007-05-26 12:43 UTC Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
` Re: ECC RAM really needed?
2007-05-26 14:52 UTC mark@mark.mielke.cc
` Re: ECC RAM really needed?
2007-05-27 14:27 UTC Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
[7+ messages in thread]
Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3
2007-05-25 18:08 UTC Dave Pirotte <dpirotte@mediamatters.org>
` Re: Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3
2007-05-25 19:17 UTC Kristo Kaiv <kristo.kaiv@skype.net>
` Re: Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3
2007-05-25 19:56 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3
2007-05-25 20:05 UTC Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
` Re: Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3
2007-05-25 20:33 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3
2007-05-25 21:37 UTC Dave Pirotte <dpirotte@mediamatters.org>
` Re: Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3
2007-05-26 12:41 UTC Kristo Kaiv <kristo.kaiv@skype.net>
[7+ messages in thread]
Adding disks/xlog & index
2007-05-25 21:43 UTC lists@on-track.ca
` Re: Adding disks/xlog & index
2007-05-25 23:47 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: Adding disks/xlog & index
2007-05-26 00:35 UTC Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
[3+ messages in thread]
My quick and dirty "solution" (Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13))
2007-05-25 12:30 UTC Bastian Voigt <post@bastian-voigt.de>
` Re: My quick and dirty "solution" (Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13))
2007-05-25 12:57 UTC Kristo Kaiv <kristo.kaiv@skype.net>
` Re: My quick and dirty "solution" (Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13))
2007-05-25 13:16 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: My quick and dirty "solution" (Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13))
2007-05-25 13:56 UTC Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
` Re: My quick and dirty "solution" (Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13))
2007-05-25 14:06 UTC Bastian Voigt <post@bastian-voigt.de>
` Re: My quick and dirty "solution" (Re: Performance Problem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13))
2007-05-25 14:11 UTC Bastian Voigt <post@bastian-voigt.de>
` Re: My quick and dirty "solution" (Re: Performance P roblem with Vacuum of bytea table (PG 8.0.13))
2007-05-25 15:20 UTC Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>
[7+ messages in thread]
Auto-ANALYZE?
2007-05-23 23:46 UTC Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
` Re: Auto-ANALYZE?
2007-05-23 23:55 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
[2+ messages in thread]
does VACUUM ANALYZE complete with this error?
2007-05-23 13:26 UTC Susan Russo <russo@morgan.harvard.edu>
` Re: does VACUUM ANALYZE complete with this error?
2007-05-23 14:01 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: does VACUUM ANALYZE complete with this error?
2007-05-23 15:57 UTC Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
` Re: does VACUUM ANALYZE complete with this error?
2007-05-23 18:18 UTC Susan Russo <russo@morgan.harvard.edu>
` Re: does VACUUM ANALYZE complete with this error?
2007-05-23 18:31 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: does VACUUM ANALYZE complete with this error?
2007-05-23 19:03 UTC Susan Russo <russo@morgan.harvard.edu>
` Re: does VACUUM ANALYZE complete with this error?
2007-05-23 22:38 UTC Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
[7+ messages in thread]
Drop table vs Delete record
2007-05-22 18:38 UTC Orhan Aglagul <oaglagul@cittio.com>
` Re: Drop table vs Delete record
2007-05-22 18:48 UTC Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>
` Re: Drop table vs Delete record
2007-05-22 18:53 UTC Orhan Aglagul <oaglagul@cittio.com>
` Re: Drop table vs Delete record
2007-05-23 20:24 UTC Chris Mair <chris@1006.org>
[4+ messages in thread]
Tips & Tricks for validating hardware/os
2007-05-22 13:10 UTC Stephane Bailliez <sbailliez@gmail.com>
` Re: Tips & Tricks for validating hardware/os
2007-05-22 13:45 UTC Alexander Staubo <alex@purefiction.net>
` Re: Tips & Tricks for validating hardware/os
2007-05-22 13:55 UTC PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
` Re: Tips & Tricks for validating hardware/os
2007-05-23 04:11 UTC Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: Tips & Tricks for validating hardware/os
2007-05-23 06:32 UTC Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>
` Re: Tips & Tricks for validating hardware/os
2007-05-23 15:51 UTC Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
[6+ messages in thread]
Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance
2007-05-22 08:23 UTC valgog <valgog@gmail.com>
` Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance
2007-05-22 09:05 UTC Peter Childs <peterachilds@gmail.com>
` Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance
2007-05-22 09:21 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance
2007-05-22 10:00 UTC valgog <valgog@gmail.com>
` Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance
2007-05-22 10:14 UTC PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
` Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance
2007-05-22 10:35 UTC valgog <valgog@gmail.com>
` Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance
2007-05-22 10:38 UTC valgog <valgog@gmail.com>
` Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance
2007-05-22 12:28 UTC cedric <cedric.villemain@dalibo.com>
` Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance
2007-05-23 08:04 UTC Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
[9+ messages in thread]
Performace comparison of indexes over timestamp fields
2007-05-22 10:39 UTC Arnau <arnaulist@andromeiberica.com>
` Re: Performace comparison of indexes over timestamp fields
2007-05-22 12:39 UTC Alexander Staubo <alex@purefiction.net>
` Re: Performace comparison of indexes over timestamp fields
2007-05-22 12:43 UTC Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
` Re: Performace comparison of indexes over timestamp fields
2007-05-22 13:00 UTC Alexander Staubo <alex@purefiction.net>
` Re: Performace comparison of indexes over timestamp fields
2007-05-22 14:11 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
[5+ messages in thread]
is file size relevant in choosing index or table scan?
2007-05-22 09:29 UTC Joost Kraaijeveld <J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl>
` Re: is file size relevant in choosing index or table scan?
2007-05-22 09:42 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
500 requests per second
2007-05-12 06:43 UTC Tarhon-Onu Victor <mituc@iasi.rdsnet.ro>
` Re: 500 requests per second
2007-05-14 09:03 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: 500 requests per second
2007-05-15 09:17 UTC Tarhon-Onu Victor <mituc@iasi.rdsnet.ro>
` Re: 500 requests per second
2007-05-15 10:47 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: 500 requests per second
2007-05-15 23:28 UTC Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
` Re: 500 requests per second
2007-05-21 19:50 UTC Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
` Re: 500 requests per second
2007-05-21 20:46 UTC Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
` Re: 500 requests per second
2007-05-21 20:48 UTC PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
` Re: 500 requests per second
2007-05-22 00:52 UTC Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
[9+ messages in thread]
Rewriting DISTINCT and losing performance
2007-05-21 04:28 UTC Chuck D. <pgsql-performance@nullmx.com>
` Re: Rewriting DISTINCT and losing performance
2007-05-21 09:14 UTC Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
` Re: Rewriting DISTINCT and losing performance
2007-05-21 11:40 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Rewriting DISTINCT and losing performance
2007-05-21 15:09 UTC Chuck D. <pgsql-performance@nullmx.com>
` Re: Rewriting DISTINCT and losing performance
2007-05-21 17:13 UTC Chuck D. <pgsql-performance@nullmx.com>
` Re: Rewriting DISTINCT and losing performance
2007-05-21 17:34 UTC Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
` Re: Rewriting DISTINCT and losing performance
2007-05-21 18:17 UTC Chuck D. <pgsql-performance@nullmx.com>
` Re: Rewriting DISTINCT and losing performance
2007-05-21 21:32 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
[8+ messages in thread]
121+ million record table perf problems
2007-05-18 17:43 UTC cyber-postgres@midnightfantasy.com
` Re: 121+ million record table perf problems
2007-05-18 18:30 UTC Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
` Re: 121+ million record table perf problems
2007-05-18 18:51 UTC Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
` Re: 121+ million record table perf problems
2007-05-18 18:53 UTC Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com>
` Re: 121+ million record table perf problems
2007-05-18 19:08 UTC Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
` Re: 121+ million record table perf problems
2007-05-18 19:37 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: 121+ million record table perf problems
2007-05-18 22:33 UTC Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
` Re: 121+ million record table perf problems
2007-05-18 23:20 UTC Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
` Re: 121+ million record table perf problems
2007-05-19 05:00 UTC Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
` Re: 121+ million record table perf problems
2007-05-21 21:24 UTC Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
[10+ messages in thread]
[next (older)]
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox